finding employer actions based on "personal or political favoritism, a grudge, random conduct, [or] an error in the administration of neutral rules" are not cognizable under Title VII, for it is "not a civil service statute" designed to remedy all ill-reasoned employer decisions
Summary of this case from Howard University v. GreenNo. 86-1749.
June 22, 1987, October TERM, 1986.
C.A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 810 F. 2d 146.
finding employer actions based on "personal or political favoritism, a grudge, random conduct, [or] an error in the administration of neutral rules" are not cognizable under Title VII, for it is "not a civil service statute" designed to remedy all ill-reasoned employer decisions
Summary of this case from Howard University v. GreenFull title:BENZIES v. ILLINOIS DEPARTMENT OF MENTAL HEALTH AND DEVELOPMENTAL…
Court:U.S.
Date published: Jun 22, 1987
"The district court has discretion to admit the statements subject to proof of these three requirements…
General Acquisition, Inc. v. Gencorp"Stone v. Davis, 66 Ohio St.2d 74, 78, 419 N.E.2d 1094, 1097-98, cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1081, 102 S.Ct. 634,…