From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Banks v. Sisto

United States District Court, E.D. California
Nov 24, 2008
No. CIV S-08-1003 GGH P (E.D. Cal. Nov. 24, 2008)

Opinion

No. CIV S-08-1003 GGH P.

November 24, 2008


ORDER


By order filed September 23, 2008, petitioner was ordered to show cause, within thirty days, why his action should not be dismissed. The thirty day period has now expired, and petitioner has not shown cause or otherwise responded to the court's order. In addition, the court has reviewed respondent's motion to dismiss and it has merit.

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this action is dismissed. See Local Rule 11-110; Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(b).


Summaries of

Banks v. Sisto

United States District Court, E.D. California
Nov 24, 2008
No. CIV S-08-1003 GGH P (E.D. Cal. Nov. 24, 2008)
Case details for

Banks v. Sisto

Case Details

Full title:CLAUDE D. BANKS, Petitioner, v. D.K. SISTO, et al., Warden, Respondent

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Nov 24, 2008

Citations

No. CIV S-08-1003 GGH P (E.D. Cal. Nov. 24, 2008)