reversing a jury verdict because omission complained of involved a future event which was "of a fickle and changeable character"
Summary of this case from Garcia v. CordovaNo. 88-1215.
March 20, 1989, OCTOBER TERM 1988.
C.A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 860 F. 2d 877.
reversing a jury verdict because omission complained of involved a future event which was "of a fickle and changeable character"
Summary of this case from Garcia v. Cordovanoting that sanctions may serve to chill zealous advocacy
Summary of this case from In re HarveyFull title:AULT v. HUSTLER MAGAZINE, INC., ET AL
Court:U.S.
Date published: Mar 20, 1989
Id., at 236 (P. Higginbotham, J., concurring). In Gomez v. City of Watsonville, 863 F.2d 1407 (9th Cir.…
Harvell v. Blytheville School Dist. # 5In 1982, Congress amended Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act to repudiate the "intent test" of City of…