holding that defendant's right to due process was not violated by the employment of his former counsel in the U.S. Attorneys office where the former counsel recused himself and was screened from the prosecution of defendant's case
Summary of this case from Lux v. CommonwealthNo. 89-1705.
October 1, 1990.
C.A. Fed. Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 895 F. 2d 745.
holding that defendant's right to due process was not violated by the employment of his former counsel in the U.S. Attorneys office where the former counsel recused himself and was screened from the prosecution of defendant's case
Summary of this case from Lux v. Commonwealthreciting the fourth requirement to establish mutual mistake that the relevant contract not put the risk of the mistake on the party seeking reformation
Summary of this case from Dairyland Power Co-op. v. U.S.applying Novotny to a claim of conspiracy to violate the ADEA
Summary of this case from Garity v. APWU Nat'l AFL-CIOFull title:ATLAS CORP. ET AL. v. UNITED STATES
Court:U.S.
Date published: Oct 1, 1990
Although the exhaustion requirement is not jurisdictional, "we have held that the requirement should be…
Landano v. RaffertyLandano was convicted in 1977 in New Jersey state court on a charge of felony murder of a police officer…