From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

ArrivalStar S.A. v. City of Vacaville

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jul 17, 2012
CASE NO: 2:12-CV-01642-GEB-GGH (E.D. Cal. Jul. 17, 2012)

Opinion

CASE NO: 2:12-CV-01642-GEB-GGH

07-17-2012

ARRIVALSTAR S.A. and MELVINO TECHNOLOGIES LIMITED, Plaintiffs, v. THE CITY OF VACAVILLE and THE CITY OF VISALIA, Defendants.

DOOLEY, HERR, PELTZER & RICHARDSON, LLP LEONARD C. HERR Attorney for Defendant CITY OF VISALIA MENNEMEIER, GLASSMAN & STROUD LLP ANDREW W. STROUD Attorney for Plaintiffs ARRIVALSTAR S.A. and MELVINO TECHNOLOGIES LIMITED


Leonard C. Herr, #081896

DOOLEY, HERR, PELTZER & RICHARDSON

Attorneys at Law, LLP

Attorneys for Defendant, CITY OF VISALIA

Andrew W. Stroud, #126475

MENNEMEIER, GLASSMAN & STROUD LLP

Attorneys for Plaintiffs, ARRIVALSTAR S.A., and

MELVINO TECHNOLOGIES LIMITED

STIPULATION AND ORDER

EXTENDING TIME FOR DEFENDANT

CITY OF VISALIA TO RESPOND TO

COMPLAINT


RECITALS

WHEREAS, Plaintiffs' Complaint for Patent Infringement was filed in this case on June 20, 2012;

WHEREAS, Defendant CITY OF VISALIA was served with a copy of the Complaint on June 29, 2012 by substituted service.

WHEREAS, Defendant CITY OF VISALIA is in the process of tendering the defense of this lawsuit;

WHEREAS, legal counsel for both parties believe a thirty (30) day extension of time in which to respond to the Complaint would adequately allow Defendant, CITY OF VISALIA, to tender the defense of this litigation; and

WHEREAS, the parties to this action will not be prejudiced by a thirty (30) day extension of time in which to allow Defendant, CITY OF VISALIA to respond to the Complaint.

STIPULATION

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED TO by and between the parties to this litigation through their respective attorneys of record that Defendant, CITY OF VISALIA shall have until August 20, 2012 in which to respond to Plaintiffs' Complaint.

DOOLEY, HERR, PELTZER & RICHARDSON, LLP

By: _________________

LEONARD C. HERR

Attorney for Defendant

CITY OF VISALIA

MENNEMEIER, GLASSMAN & STROUD LLP

By: _________________

ANDREW W. STROUD

Attorney for Plaintiffs

ARRIVALSTAR S.A. and MELVINO

TECHNOLOGIES LIMITED

ORDER

UPON GOOD CAUSE BEING SHOWN, as set forth in the stipulation of counsel, Defendant, CITY OF VISALIA shall have until August 20, 2012 in which to respond to Plaintiffs' Complaint.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

_________________

GARLAND E. BURRELL, JR.

Senior United States District Judge


Summaries of

ArrivalStar S.A. v. City of Vacaville

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jul 17, 2012
CASE NO: 2:12-CV-01642-GEB-GGH (E.D. Cal. Jul. 17, 2012)
Case details for

ArrivalStar S.A. v. City of Vacaville

Case Details

Full title:ARRIVALSTAR S.A. and MELVINO TECHNOLOGIES LIMITED, Plaintiffs, v. THE CITY…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Jul 17, 2012

Citations

CASE NO: 2:12-CV-01642-GEB-GGH (E.D. Cal. Jul. 17, 2012)