Summary
granting leave to appeal "limited to the issue of the proper interpretation of 'converting property to the other person's own use,' as used in MCL 600.2919a"
Summary of this case from Hunt v. HaddenOpinion
Docket Nos. 148907 148909. COA No. 311145.
2014-09-19
AROMA WINES AND EQUIPMENT, INC., Plaintiff/Counter–Defendant–Appellant, v. COLUMBIAN DISTRIBUTION SERVICES, INC., Defendant/Counter–Plaintiff–Appellee. Aroma Wines and Equipment, Inc., Plaintiff/Counter–Defendant–Appellee, Cross–Appellant, v. Columbian Distribution Services, Inc., Defendant/Counter–Plaintiff–Appellant, Cross–Appellee.
Prior report: 303 Mich.App. 441, 844 N.W.2d 727.
Order
On order of the Court, the applications for leave to appeal the December 17, 2013 judgment of the Court of Appeals and the application for leave to appeal as cross-appellant are considered. The applications for leave to appeal are GRANTED, limited to the issue of the proper interpretation of “converting property to the other person's own use,” as used in MCL 600.2919a. The application for leave to appeal as cross-appellant remains pending.
Persons or groups interested in the determination of the issue presented in this case may move the Court for permission to file briefs amicus curiae. Motions for permission to file briefs amicus curiae should be filed in Docket No. 148907 only.