Summary
applying arbitrary-and-capricious standard de novo
Summary of this case from Jett v. Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Alabama, Inc.Opinion
No. 85-566.
November 18, 1985.
C.A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 759 F. 2d 1518.
From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research
Andersen v. Ciba-Geigy Corp.
U.S.
Nov 18, 1985
474 U.S. 995 (1985)
Summaries of
Andersen v. Ciba-Geigy Corp.
U.S.
Nov 18, 1985
474 U.S. 995 (1985)
applying arbitrary-and-capricious standard de novo
Summary of this case from Jett v. Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Alabama, Inc.construing "terminated," but denying benefits on basis of other plan provisions.
Summary of this case from Adams v. Ampco-Pittsburgh Corp.Case details for
Andersen v. Ciba-Geigy Corp.
Case Details
Full title:ANDERSEN ET AL. v. CIBA-GEIGY CORP. ET AL
Court:U.S.
Date published: Nov 18, 1985
Citations
474 U.S. 995 (1985)
106 S. Ct. 410
Citing Cases
INTERN. PAPER v. TAXATION DIV. DIR
However, these cases do not enunciate a single test to determine whether a business is unitary. Silent Hoist…
Beeson v. EricksonThis is not permissible and is reversible under the rationale set forth in Isler. The next significant…