From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Alston v. Cnty. of Sacramento

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jul 18, 2012
No. 2:11-cv-2281 GEB GGH PS (E.D. Cal. Jul. 18, 2012)

Opinion

No. 2:11-cv-2281 GEB GGH PS

07-18-2012

CD ALSTON, Plaintiff, v. COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

On July 2, 2012, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on the parties and which contained notice that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen (14) days. No objections were filed. Accordingly, the court presumes any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United States, 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge's conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. See Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir. 1983).

The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by the magistrate judge's analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations (dkt. no. 26) are ADOPTED IN FULL;

2. Plaintiff's motion for leave of court (dkt. no. 25), construed as a request to stay the action, is DENIED.

____________________________

GARLAND E. BURRELL, JR.

Senior United States District Judge


Summaries of

Alston v. Cnty. of Sacramento

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jul 18, 2012
No. 2:11-cv-2281 GEB GGH PS (E.D. Cal. Jul. 18, 2012)
Case details for

Alston v. Cnty. of Sacramento

Case Details

Full title:CD ALSTON, Plaintiff, v. COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Jul 18, 2012

Citations

No. 2:11-cv-2281 GEB GGH PS (E.D. Cal. Jul. 18, 2012)