From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Alcaraz v. Napolitano

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA OAKLAND DIVISION
Apr 12, 2013
No.: C 13-511 SBA (N.D. Cal. Apr. 12, 2013)

Opinion

No.: C 13-511 SBA

04-12-2013

BERNAVE ALCARAZ, et al., Plaintiffs, v. JANET NAPOLITANO, et al., Defendants.

STUART F. DELERY Acting Assistant Attorney General DAVID J. KLINE Director, Office of Immigration Litigation, District Court Section LANA L. VAHAB (DC 976203) Trial Attorney United States Department of Justice Office of Immigration Litigation District Court Section Attorneys for Defendants H. Nelson Meeks H. NELSON MEEKS Law Office of H. Nelson Meeks Attorney for Plaintiffs


STUART F. DELERY
Acting Assistant Attorney General
DAVID J. KLINE
Director, Office of Immigration Litigation, District Court Section
LANA L. VAHAB (DC 976203)
Trial Attorney
United States Department of Justice
Office of Immigration Litigation
District Court Section
Attorneys for Defendants

SECOND STIPULATION TO EXTEND

TIME WITHIN WHICH THE

DEFENDANTS MUST FILE AN ANSWER

OR OTHERWISE RESPOND and ORDER


SECOND STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME FOR DEFENDANTS TO ANSWER

Plaintiffs, by and through their attorney of record, and Defendants, by and through their attorneys of record, hereby stipulate, subject to the approval of the Court, to an extension of time within which the Defendants must serve their answer, or other responsive pleading to the complaint. In support thereof, the parties state as follows:

1. Plaintiffs filed the instant complaint for money damages on February 5, 2013. (ECF No. 1.)

2. Plaintiffs properly effectuated service on those Defendants sued in their official capacities on February 7, 2013.

3. According to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(a)(3), Defendants' original deadline to answer or otherwise respond to the complaint is April 8, 2013. Pursuant to the Parties' Stipulation to Extend Time (ECF No. 11), this original deadline was extended to April 12, 2013.

4. On April 10, 2013, after a discussion with Defendants' counsel, counsel for Plaintiffs informed Defendants' counsel that he plans to file an amended complaint in this action by approximately April 19, 2013.

5. In the interest of judicial economy, the parties agree that Defendants will not respond to Plaintiffs' original complaint, but will instead wait for Plaintiffs to file their First Amended Complaint and will then respond in accordance with the time allotted by Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(a)(3).

6. The undersigned contacted Plaintiffs' counsel, H. Nelson Meeks, by e-mail on April 11, 2013, regarding this stipulation. Mr. Meeks indicated that he agreed to this stipulation.

Respectfully submitted, STUART F. DELERY
Acting Assistant Attorney General
DAVID J. KLINE
Director

______________________

LANA L. VAHAB

Trial Attorney

United States Department of Justice

Office of Immigration Litigation

District Court Section

P.O. Box 868, Ben Franklin Station

Washington, D.C. 20044

Telephone: (202) 532-4067

Facsimile: (202) 305-7000

E-mail: lana.vahab@usdoj.gov

Attorneys for Defendants

H. Nelson Meeks (with permission)

H. NELSON MEEKS

Law Office of H. Nelson Meeks

Attorney for Plaintiffs

ORDER

Pursuant to Stipulation, IT IS SO ORDERED.

______________________

SAUNDRA BROWN ARMSTRONG

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Alcaraz v. Napolitano

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA OAKLAND DIVISION
Apr 12, 2013
No.: C 13-511 SBA (N.D. Cal. Apr. 12, 2013)
Case details for

Alcaraz v. Napolitano

Case Details

Full title:BERNAVE ALCARAZ, et al., Plaintiffs, v. JANET NAPOLITANO, et al.…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA OAKLAND DIVISION

Date published: Apr 12, 2013

Citations

No.: C 13-511 SBA (N.D. Cal. Apr. 12, 2013)