From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Alcantar v. Astrue

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jan 3, 2012
No. CIV-S-10-2638 GEB GGH (E.D. Cal. Jan. 3, 2012)

Opinion

No. CIV-S-10-2638 GEB GGH

01-03-2012

ELVIA H. ALCANTAR, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant.


ORDER

On December 7, 2011, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on the parties and which contained notice that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. No objections were filed.

Accordingly, the court presumes any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United States, 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge's conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. See Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir. 1983).

The court has reviewed the applicable legal standards and, good cause appearing, concludes that it is appropriate to adopt the proposed Findings and Recommendations in full.

Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that the Findings and Recommendations filed December 7, 2011 (dkt. no. 18), are ADOPTED and

1. Plaintiff's motion for summary judgment (dkt. no. 14) is granted in part;

2. Defendant's cross-motion for summary judgment (dkt. no. 15) is denied;

3. The case is remanded for further proceedings under sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g); and

4. Judgment is entered for plaintiff.

____________

GARLAND E. BURRELL, JR.

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Alcantar v. Astrue

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jan 3, 2012
No. CIV-S-10-2638 GEB GGH (E.D. Cal. Jan. 3, 2012)
Case details for

Alcantar v. Astrue

Case Details

Full title:ELVIA H. ALCANTAR, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Jan 3, 2012

Citations

No. CIV-S-10-2638 GEB GGH (E.D. Cal. Jan. 3, 2012)