Summary
holding that a question is "controlling" if error in its resolution would warrant reversal of a final judgment or dismissal
Summary of this case from Adams v. Burlington Northern R. Co.Opinion
No. 73-781.
October 15, 1974.
holding that a question is "controlling" if error in its resolution would warrant reversal of a final judgment or dismissal
Summary of this case from Adams v. Burlington Northern R. Co.No. 73-781.
October 15, 1974.
holding that a question is "controlling" if error in its resolution would warrant reversal of a final judgment or dismissal
Summary of this case from Adams v. Burlington Northern R. Co.holding that the scienter element in the statute prohibiting the mailing of obscene material required only that the defendant know the content of the material, not that it was legally obscene
Summary of this case from Outmezguine v. Staterequiring that the district judge certify that the order satisfies all three criteria
Summary of this case from BENNETT v. ROMO CORP.requiring that the district judge certify that the order satisfies all three criteria
Summary of this case from Green v. Fund Asset Management, L.P.enforcing an arbitration clause as "a specialized kind of forum-selection clause. . . ."
Summary of this case from Gilman v. Wheat, First SecuritiesFull title:SCHERK v. ALBERTO-CULVER CO
Court:U.S.
Date published: Oct 15, 1974
We have taken the position that "[t]o qualify for interlocutory review in this circuit, a class certification…
Zeltzer v. Carte Blanche CorporationAccordingly, the facts presented in the text are as stated in the pleadings, and in matters outside the…