Trump Plaza Associates d/b/a Trump Plaza Hotel and Casino

National Labor Relations Board - Board Decisions

Aug 29, 2008

352 N.L.R.B. 146 (N.L.R.B. 2008)

352 NLRB No. 146
NOTICE: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the
bound volumes of NLRB decisions. Readers are requested to notify the Ex-
ecutive Secretary, National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C.
20570, of any typographical or other formal errors so that corrections can
be included in the bound volumes.
Trump Plaza Associates d/b/a Trump Plaza Hotel and
Casino and International Union, United Auto-
mobile, Aerospace & Agricultural Implement
Workers of America, AFL–CIO. Case 4–CA–
36217
August 29, 2008
DECISION AND ORDER
BY CHAIRMAN SCHAUMBER AND MEMBER LIEBMAN
This is a refusal-to-bargain case in which the Respon-
dent is contesting the Union’s certification as bargaining
representative in the underlying representation proceed-
ing. Pursuant to a charge filed on July 1, 2008, the Gen-
eral Counsel issued the complaint on July 10, 2008, al-
leging that the Respondent has violated Section 8(a)(5)
and (1) of the Act by refusing the Union’s request to bar-
gain following the Union’s certification in Case 4–RC–
21263. (Official notice is taken of the “record” in the
representation proceeding as defined in the Board’s
Rules and Regulations, Secs. 102.68 and 102.69(g);
Frontier Hotel, 265 NLRB 343 (1982).) The Respondent
filed an answer and an amended answer admitting in part
and denying in part the allegations in the complaint and
asserting affirmative defenses.1
On August 4, 2008, the General Counsel filed a Mo-
tion for Summary Judgment and Memorandum in Sup-
port of Motion. On August 5, 2008, the Board issued an
order transferring the proceeding to the Board and a No-
tice to Show Cause why the motion should not be
granted. The Respondent filed a response.
Ruling on Motion for Summary Judgment2
In its amended answer and response, the Respondent
admits its refusal to bargain, but contests the validity of

1 The Respondent’s answers deny knowledge or information suffi-
cient to form a belief concerning the filing and service of the charge,
but admit that it received a copy of the charge on or about July 2, 2008.
Accordingly, we find that the Respondent’s denials in this regard do not
raise any issue of fact warranting a hearing.
2 Effective midnight December 28, 2007, Members Liebman,
Schaumber, Kirsanow, and Walsh delegated to Members Liebman,
Schaumber, and Kirsanow, as a three-member group, all of the Board’s
powers in anticipation of the expiration of the terms of Members Kir-
sanow and Walsh on December 31, 2007. Pursuant to this delegation,
Chairman Schaumber and Member Liebman constitute a quorum of the
three-member group. As a quorum, they have the authority to issue
decisions and orders in unfair labor practice and representation cases.
See Sec. 3(b) of the Act.
the certification on the basis of its objections to the elec-
tion in the representation proceeding.3
All representation issues raised by the Respondent
were or could have been litigated in the prior representa-
tion proceeding. The Respondent does not offer to ad-
duce at a hearing any newly discovered and previously
unavailable evidence, nor does it allege any special cir-
cumstances that would require the Board to reexamine
the decision made in the representation proceeding. We
therefore find that the Respondent has not raised any
representation issue that is properly litigable in this un-
fair labor practice proceeding. See Pittsburgh Plate
Glass Co. v. NLRB, 313 U.S. 146, 162 (1941). Accord-
ingly, we grant the Motion for Summary Judgment.4
On the entire record, the Board makes the following
FINDINGS OF FACT
I. JURISDICTION
At all material times, the Respondent, a corporation,
has been engaged in the operation of a casino at Missis-
sippi Avenue and the Boardwalk in Atlantic City, New
Jersey (the Casino). During the 12-month period preced-
ing issuance of the complaint, the Respondent, in con-
ducting its business operations described above, received
gross revenues in excess of $500,000 and purchased and
received at the Casino goods valued in excess of $5000
directly from points outside the State of New Jersey.
We find that the Respondent is an employer engaged
in commerce within the meaning of Section 2(2), (6), and
(7) of the Act, and that the International Union, United
Automobile, Aerospace & Agricultural Implement
Workers of America, AFL–CIO (the Union) is a labor
organization within the meaning of Section 2(5) of the
Act.
II. ALLEGED UNFAIR LABOR PRACTICES
A. The Certification
Following the representation election held on March
31, 2007, the Union was certified on May 30, 2008, as
the exclusive collective-bargaining representative of the
employees in the following appropriate unit:
All full-time and regular part-time dealers employed by
Respondent at its Mississippi and the Boardwalk, At-
lantic City, New Jersey facility, excluding all other em-

3 The Respondent contests the validity of the Union’s certification
on the basis that the Board lacked a quorum on May 30, 2008, when it
issued the Decision and Certification of Representative in the underly-
ing representation case, 352 NLRB No. 76 (2008). However, this de-
fense is without merit for the reasons stated above in footnote two.
4 Thus, we deny the Respondent’s request that the complaint be
dismissed in its entirety.
DECISIONS OF THE NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD2
ployees, cashiers, pit clerks, clerical employees, engi-
neers, guards and supervisors as defined in the Act.
The Union continues to be the exclusive collective-
bargaining representative of the unit employees under Sec-
tion 9(a) of the Act.
B. Refusal to Bargain
By letter dated June 5, 2008, the Union requested that
the Respondent recognize and bargain with it as the ex-
clusive collective-bargaining representative of the unit.
By letter dated June 25, 2008, the Respondent notified
the Union that it would not bargain with it. We find that
the Respondent’s refusal to bargain with the Union con-
stitutes an unlawful failure and refusal to bargain in vio-
lation of Section 8(a)(5) and (1) of the Act.
CONCLUSION OF LAW
By refusing since June 25, 2008, to recognize and bar-
gain with the Union as the exclusive collective-
bargaining representative of the unit employees, the Re-
spondent has engaged in unfair labor practices affecting
commerce within the meaning of Section 8(a)(5) and (1)
and Section 2(6) and (7) of the Act.
REMEDY
Having found that the Respondent has violated Section
8(a)(5) and (1) of the Act, we shall order it to cease and
desist, to bargain on request with the Union and, if an
understanding is reached, to embody the understanding
in a signed agreement.
To ensure that the employees are accorded the services
of their selected bargaining agent for the period provided
by law, we shall construe the initial period of the certifi-
cation as beginning the date the Respondent begins to
bargain in good faith with the Union. Mar-Jac Poultry
Co., 136 NLRB 785 (1962); Lamar Hotel, 140 NLRB
226, 229 (1962), enfd. 328 F.2d 600 (5th Cir. 1964), cert.
denied 379 U.S. 817 (1964); and Burnett Construction
Co., 149 NLRB 1419, 1421 (1964), enfd. 350 F.2d 57
(10th Cir. 1965).
ORDER
The National Labor Relations Board orders that the
Respondent, Trump Plaza Associates d/b/a Trump Plaza
Hotel and Casino, Atlantic City, New Jersey, its officers,
agents, successors, and assigns, shall
1. Cease and desist from
(a) Refusing to recognize and bargain with Interna-
tional Union, United Automobile, Aerospace & Agricul-
tural Implement Workers of America, AFL-CIO, as the
exclusive collective-bargaining representative of the em-
ployees in the bargaining unit.
(b) In any like or related manner interfering with, re-
straining, or coercing employees in the exercise of the
rights guaranteed them by Section 7 of the Act.
2. Take the following affirmative action necessary to
effectuate the policies of the Act.
(a) On request, bargain with the Union as the exclusive
representative of the employees in the following appro-
priate unit on terms and conditions of employment and, if
an understanding is reached, embody the understanding
in a signed agreement:
All full-time and regular part-time dealers employed by
Respondent at its Mississippi and the Boardwalk, At-
lantic City, New Jersey facility, excluding all other em-
ployees, cashiers, pit clerks, clerical employees, engi-
neers, guards and supervisors as defined in the Act.
(b) Within 14 days after service by the Region, post at
its facility in Atlantic City, New Jersey, copies of the
attached notice marked “Appendix.”5 Copies of the no-
tice, on forms provided by the Regional Director for Re-
gion 4, after being signed by the Respondent’s author-
ized representative, shall be posted by the Respondent
and maintained for 60 consecutive days in conspicuous
places, including all places where notices to employees
are customarily posted. Reasonable steps shall be taken
by the Respondent to ensure that the notices are not al-
tered, defaced, or covered by any other material. In the
event that, during the pendency of these proceedings, the
Respondent has gone out of business or closed the facil-
ity involved in these proceedings, the Respondent shall
duplicate and mail, at its own expense, a copy of the no-
tice to all current employees and former employees em-
ployed by the Respondent at any time since June 25,
2008.
(c) Within 21 days after service by the Region, file
with the Regional Director a sworn certification of a re-
sponsible official on a form provided by the Region at-
testing to the steps that the Respondent has taken to
comply.
Dated, Washington, D.C. August 29, 2008
Peter C. Schaumber, Chairman
Wilma B. Liebman, Member

5 If this Order is enforced by a judgment of a United States court of
appeals, the words in the notice reading “Posted by Order of the Na-
tional Labor Relations Board” shall read “Posted Pursuant to a Judg-
ment of the United States Court of Appeals Enforcing an Order of the
National Labor Relations Board.”
TRUMP PLAZA HOTEL& CASINO 3
(SEAL) NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD
APPENDIX
NOTICE TO EMPLOYEES
POSTED BY ORDER OF THE
NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD
An Agency of the United States Government
The National Labor Relations Board has found that we vio-
lated Federal labor law and has ordered us to post and obey
this notice.
FEDERAL LAW GIVES YOU THE RIGHT TO
Form, join or assist a union
Choose representatives to bargain with us on
your behalf
Act together with other employees for your bene-
fit and protection
Choose not to engage in any of these protected
activities.
WE WILL NOT refuse to recognize and bargain with In-
ternational Union, United Automobile, Aerospace & Ag-
ricultural Implement Workers of America, AFL–CIO, as
the exclusive collective-bargaining representative of the
employees in the bargaining unit.
WE WILL NOT in any like or related manner interfere
with, restrain, or coerce you in the exercise of the rights
guaranteed you by Section 7 of the Act.
WE WIL, on request, recognize and bargain with the
Union and put in writing and sign any agreement reached
on terms and conditions of employment for our employ-
ees in the following bargaining unit:
All full-time and regular part-time dealers employed by
us at our Mississippi and the Boardwalk, Atlantic City,
New Jersey facility, excluding all other employees,
cashiers, pit clerks, clerical employees, engineers,
guards and supervisors as defined in the Act.
TRUMP PLAZA ASSOCIATES D/B/A TRUMP
PLAZA HOTEL AND CASINO