The Steel Storage File Co.

National Labor Relations Board - Board Decisions

Sep 14, 1940

27 N.L.R.B. 210 (N.L.R.B. 1940)

In the Matter of THE STEEL STORAGE FILE COMPANY and FEDERAL
LABOR UNION No. 18267, AFFILIATED WITH THE AMERICAN FEDERA-
TION OF LABOR
Case No. R-2002.-Decided September 14, 1940
Jurisdiction : office steel storage file manufacturing industry.
Investigation and Certification of Representatives : existence of question: con-
flicting claims of rival representatives ;,contract with rival union expressly sub-
ject to Board action and to termination upon, subsequent designation of other
representative, no bar to ; election necessary.
Pay-roll date preceding direction of election used, notwithstanding one of
the unions involved urged use of pay roll for period about nine months earlier
on the ground that since that time the number of employees had more than
doubled, where the business of the employer had been steadily increasing and
employees hired during such period were employed on a permanent basis.
Unit Appropriate for Collective Bargaining : production and maintenance ein-
ployees, including shipping-room employees and group leaders, but excluding
supervisory and office employees and the night foreman.
Group leaders having minor supervisory powers included in unit where they
are production workers and work with the employees whose work they direct,
and where the union desiring their exclusion had previously undertaken to
bargain for them by including them in an agreement entered into with the
employer.
Brother of president of the employer and owner of one share of stock in the
Company included in unit notwithstanding he receives a weekly bonus in addi-
tion to his hourly paid wages and one of the unions involved desires his exclu-
sion from the unit, where he is employed as maintenance man and part-time
punch operator and has no authority to hire or discharge employees or make
recommendations to that effect.
Practice and Procedure
Motion of one of the unions involved to dismiss petition on ground that the
employer had discouraged membership in the union and favored the petitioner,
denied where, at the time of the filing of the petition a complaint proceeding
charging the employer with the above-mentioned unfair labor practices was
pending before the Board, and thereafter was settled pursuant to a stipula-
tion entered into by the employer, the union now moving for dismissal of the
petition, and a representative of the Board.
Mr. James P. Miller, of Cleveland, Ohio, for the Company.
Mr. Coleman Clalierty, of Cleveland, Ohio, for the Federal.
Mr. Sam H. Griff, of Cleveland, Ohio, for the U. A. W,
Mr. Sidney L. Davis, of counsel to the Board.
27 N. L R. B , No. 46.
210
THE STEEL STORAGE FILE COMPANY 211
DECISION
AND
DIRECTION OF ELECTION
STATEMENT OF THE CASE
On April 26, 1940, Federal Labor Union No. 18267, affiliated with
the American Federation of Labor, herein called the Federal, filed with
the Regional Director for the Eighth Region (Cleveland, Ohio), a
petition alleging that a question affecting commerce had arisen con-
cerning the representation of employees of The Steel Storage File
Company,l Cleveland, Ohio, herein called the Company, and request-
ing an investigation and certification of representatives pursuant to.
Section 9 (c) of the National Labor Relations Act, 49 Stat. 449, herein
called the Act. On August 7, 1940, the National Labor Relations;
Board, herein called the Board, acting pursuant to Section 9 (c) of
the Act and Article III, Section 3, of National Labor Relations
Board Rules and Regulations-Series 2, as amended, ordered an in-
vestigation and authorized the Regional Director to conduct it and
to provide for an appropriate hearing upon due notice. -
On August 7, 1940, the Regional Director issued a notice of hearing,z
copies of which were duly served upon the Company, the Federal, and
upon United Automobile Workers of America,,Local No. 217, affiliated
with the Congress of Industrial Organizations, herein called the
U. A. W., a labor organization claiming to represent employees directly
affected by the investigation. Pursuant to the notice, a hearing was
held on August 14 and 15, 1940, at Cleveland, Ohio, before Harry L.
Lodish, the Trial Examiner duly designated by the Board. The Com-
pany, the Federal, and the U. A. W. were represented by counsel and
participated in the hearing. Full opportunity to be heard, to examine
and cross-examine witnesses, and to introduce evidence bearing on the
issues was afforded all parties. During the course of the hearing the
Trial Examiner made several rulings on motions and on objections to
the admission of evidence. The Board has reviewed the rulings of the
Trial Examiner and finds that no prejudicial errors were committed.
The rulings are hereby affirmed. At 'the close of the hearing the
U. A. W. moved to dismiss the petition on the ground that the Com-
pany was responsible for the resignations of a number of members of
the U. A. W. and'that the Company aided the Federal in securing -
'The Company was incorrectly designated in the petition as Steel Storage File Com-
pany Correction was made at the hearing.
2 The notice of hearing was incorrectly dated August 6, 1940 Correction was made
by an order duly served on the parties on August 12, 1940 - - -
212 DECISIONS OF NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD
members among its employees. - The Trial Examiner reserved ruling.
For reasons stated in Section III, infra, the motion is hereby denied.
Upon the entire record in the case, the Board makes the following:
FINDINGS OF FACT
I. THE BUSINESS OF THE COMPANY
The Steel Storage File Company, an Ohio corporation with its
principal office and plant located at Cleveland, Ohio, is engaged in
the manufacture, sale, and distribution of office steel storage files.
During 1938 the Company purchased raw materials amounting to
$33,388.90, of which $14,498.42 consisted of raw materials purchased
outside the State of Ohio. During the same year the total sales
amounted to $115,457.46, of which $75,000 consisted of sales outside
the State of Ohio. - In 1939 the Company's purchases and sales were-
substantially the same as they had been in 1938, except for a slight
increase. The Company admits that it is engaged in interstate com-
merce within the meaning of the Act.
II. THE ORGANIZATIONS INVOLVED
Federal Labor Union No. 18267 is a labor organization affiliated
with the American Federation of Labor, admitting to membership
the production and maintenance employees of the Company, in-
cluding shipping-room employees, and excluding supervisory and
office employees.
United Automobile Workers of America, Local No. 217 is a labor
organization affiliated with the Congress of Industrial Organiza-
tions, admitting to membership the same classes of employees as
the Federal.
M. THE QUESTION CONCERNING REPRESENTATION
Both the Federal and the U. A. W. claim to represent a majority
of the employees concerned. On May 6, 1940, the U. A. W. and the
Company entered into a written agreement wherein the Company
recognized the U. A. W. as the exclusive representative and agreed
to "bargain collectively with no other labor organization unless
directed by the National Labor Relations Board to do so." The
agreement further provided that in the event the' Board found the
U. A. W. not to be the sole bargaining agent for the employees, the
agreement was to become null and void. In view of these provisions,
the contract cannot be considered a bar to the claim of the Federal.8
8 See Matter of Monument Mills and Textile Workers Brotherhood, 10 N. L. R. B. 347.
THE STEEL STORAGE FILE COMPANY 213
As set forth above, at the hearing the U. A. W. moved to dismiss the)
petition on the ground that the Company discouraged membership in
the U. A. W. and also assisted the Federal in securing members among
its employees. At the time of the filing of the petition, a proceeding
under Section 10 of the Act was pending before the Board wherein
the U. A. W. had charged the Company with the above-mentioned
unfair labor practices. On May 17, 1940, pursuant to a stipulation
entered into by the Company, the U. A. W., and a representative of the
Board, this proceeding was settled, and an order based thereon was
entered by the Board on June 15, 1940.4 Under these circumstances
the motion to dismiss the petition is denied.5 ,
We find that a question has arisen concerning representation of
employees of the Company.
IV. TIIE EFFECT OF THE QUESTION CONCERNING REPRESENTATION UPON
COMMERCE
We find that the question concerning representation which has arisen,
occurring in connection with the operatiolis of the Company described
in Section I above, has a close, intimate, and substantial relation to
trade, traffic, and commerce among the several States, and tends to lead
to labor disputes burdening and obstructing commerce and the free
flow of commerce.
V. THE APPROPRIATE UNIT
At the hearing the Federal and the U. A. W. stipulated that the pro-
duction and maintenance employees of the Company, including ship-
ping-room employees, but excluding supervisory and office employees,
constitute a unit appropriate for the purposes of collective bargaining.
The only controversy is as to whether or not W. H. Regenhardt and
four group leaders, all of whom receive bonuses in addition to their
regular wages, should be included in the appropriate units The
U. A. W. contends that these five employees exercise supervisory func-
tions and should be excluded from the unit.T -The Federal contends
that they are not supervisors and should be included.
W. H. Regenhardt is a brother of the president of the Company and
owns one share of stock in the Company. He is employed as a mainte-
a Matter of The Steel Storage File Company and United Automobile Workers of America,
Local 217, affi liated with the Congress of Industrial Organizations , 24 N. L. R B 748.
5 See Matter of New England Transportation Company and International Association
of Machinists, 1 N. L R. B. 130; Matter of Pennsylvania Greyhound Lines et at. and
The Brotherhood of Railroad Trainmen, 3 N. L. R. B. 622; Matter of Standard Oil Com-
pany of New Jersey and United Licensed Officers of the U. S. A., 8 N. L. R. B. 936.
9 These five employees are paid on an houily basis as are all employees within the unit
except one who receives a weekly salary but as to whom there is no controversy.
7A sixth employee who receives a bonus in addition to his regular wages, George Beno,
the night foreman, will be excluded from the appropriate unit, such exclusion having been
requested by the U. A. W. and acquiesced in by the Federal at the hearing
214 DECISIONS 'OF NATIONAL LABOR, RELATIONS BOARD
Hance man and part-time punch operator. He has no authority to hire
.or discharge employees or make any recommendations to that effect.
We shall include him in the unit.'
The four group leaders, Arthur Berkey, Ray Miller, Walter Miller,
and Boyd Boehnell, are production workers, who direct the work of
employees under them and, at the same time, work with them. While
there is some evidence to indicate that these group leaders have minor
supervisory functions, nevertheless, the U. A. W. has undertaken to
bargain for these employees by including them in the agreement
entered into with the Company on May 6, 1940.8 We shall include
the group leaders in the appropriate unit.9
We find that the production and maintenance employees of the Com-
pany, including shipping-room employees and group leaders, but ex-
cluding supervisory and office employees and the night foreman, con-
stitute a unit appropriate for the purposes of collective bargaining
and that said unit will insure to employees of the Company the full
benefit of their right to self-organization and to collective bargaining
and otherwise effectuate the policies of the Act.
VI. THE DETERMINATION OF REPRESENTATIVES
Prior to the hearing the Federal and the U. A. W. submitted to the
Trial Examiner application cards signed by employees of the Com-
pany designating the respective labor 'organizations as collective bar-
gaining representatives. It is undisputed that of the 60 employees on
the current pay roll, 25 designated only the Federal, and 17 only the
-U. A. W. In addition, 10 had at some time or other designated both
the Federal and the U. A. W. Both the Federal and the U. A. W.,
therefore, have substantial membership among the employees in the
unit found appropriate in Section V, above. The Federal desires an
election and requests that the current pay roll be used as a basis for
determining those employees eligible to vote. The U. A. W. contends
that, in the event an election is directed by the Board, the pay roll
from November 15 to December -15, 1939,10 should be used because :
(1) subsequent to November 1939 the Company discouraged member-
ship in the U. A. W. and thereafter favored the Federal when it
attempted to organize the employees; and (2) the current pay roll
does not reflect the normal state of employment with the Company.
B The group leaders are named in Appendix A of the agreement mentioned in Section III,
supra, as eligible employees in the unit appropriate for collective bargaining.
- 0 See Matter of City Auto Stamping Company and International Union, United Auto-
mobile Workers of America, affiliated with the C I. 0., 15 N. L. R. B. 1032.
30 As stated in the iecoi d the pay-roll date requested by U. A. W. was from Navember 15
to December 15, 1940 However, it is obvious from reading the entire record that this was
an error and that the U. A. W. referred to the pay-roll date from November 15 to
December 15, 1939.
THE STEEL STORAGE FILE COMPANY 215
For the reasons stated in Section III, supra, we do not consider the
first contention controlling. As for the second contention, the record
indicates that the business of the Company has been steadily increasing
and that persons hired since January 1940 have been employed on a
permanent basis.
We find that the question concerning representation which has
arisen can best be resolved by an election by secret ballot. We shall
use as the date for determining eligibility of employees to vote the
pay-roll date immediately preceding the date of this Direction of
Election.
Upon the basis of the above findings of fact and upon the entire
record in the case, the Board makes the following :
CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
1. A question affecting commerce has arisen concerning the repre-
sentation of employees of The Steel Storage File Company, Cleveland,
Ohio, within the meaning of Section 9 (c) and Section 2 (6) and (7)
of the National Labor Relations Act.
2. The production and maintenance employees of the Company,
including shipping-room employees and group leaders, but excluding
supervisory and office employees, and the night foreman, constitute a
unit appropriate for the purposes of collective bargaining.
DIRECTION OF ELECTION
By virtue of and pursuant to the power vested in the National Labor
Relations Board by Section 9 (c) of the National Labor Relations Act,
and pursuant to Article III, Section 8, of National Labor Relations
Board Rules and Regulations-Series 2, as amended, it is hereby
DIRECTED that, as part of the investigation authorized by the Board
to ascertain representatives for the purposes of collective bargaining
with The Steel Storage File Company, Cleveland, Ohio, an election by
secret ballot shall be conducted as early as possible but not later than
thirty (30) days from the date of this Direction, under the direction
and supervision of the Regional Director for the Eighth Region, acting
in this matter as agent for the National Labor Relations Board, and
subject to Article III, Section 9, of said Rules and Regulations, among
the production and maintenance) employees of the Company who were
employed during the pay-roll period immediately preceding the date
of this Direction of Election, including shipping-room employees,
group leaders, and employees who did not work during such pay-roll
period because they were ill or on vacation, and employees who were
then or have since been temporarily laid off, but excluding supervisory
and office employees, the night foreman, and employees who have since
216 DECISIONS OF NATIONAL LABOR` RELATIONS BOARD
quit or been discharged for cause, to'determine whether such employees
desire to be represented by Federal Labor Union No. 18267, affiliated
with the American Federation of Labor, or, by United Automobile
Workers of America, Local No. 217, affiliated with the Congress of
Industrial Organizations, for the purposes of collective bargaining, or
by neither.
[SAME TITLE
SUPPLEMENTAL DECISION
AND
CERTIFICATION OF REPRESENTATIVES
October 28, 1940
On September 14, 1940, the National Labor Relations Board, herein
called the Board, issued a Decision and Direction of Election in the
above-entitled proceedings. Pursuant to the Direction of Election,
an election by secret ballot was conducted on September 27, 1940, under
the direction and supervision of the Regional Director for the Eighth
Region (Cleveland, Ohio). On - September 28, 1940, the Regional
Director acting pursuant to Article III, Section 9, of National Labor
Relations Board Rules and Regulations-Series 2, as amended, issued
and duly served upon the parties his Election Report.
As to the balloting and its results, the Regional Director reported
as follows :
Total number of employees eligible--------------------------- 50
Total number of ballots cast--------------------------------- 48
Total number of votes for Federal Labor Union No. 18267
(A. F. L.) ------------------------------------------------ 29
Total number of votes for United Automobile Workers of Amer-
ica, Local No. 217 (C I 0 )------------------------------- 19
Total number of votes cast for neither organization----------- 0
Total number of blank ballots------------------------------- 0
Total number of void ballots-------------------------------- 0
Total number of challenged votes-- -------------------------- 0
On October 3, 1940, United Automobile Workers of America, Local
No. 217, affiliated with the Congress of Industrial Organizations,
herein called the U. A. W., filed with the Regional Director its objec-
tions to the conduct of the ballot and the Election Report. On Octo-
ber 17, 1940, the Regional Director, acting pursuant to Article III,
Section 9, of National Labor Relations Board Rules and Regulations-
Series 2, as amended, issued and duly served his Report on the Objec-
tions of the U. A. W. to the conduct of the secret ballot and the Elec-
tion Report.
THE STEEL STORAGE FILE COMPANY 217
The Board has considered the objections of the U. A. W. and finds
that they do not raise substantial or material issues with respect to
the conduct of the ballot or the Election Report. The objections are
hereby overruled.
CERTIFICATION OF REPRESENTATIVES
By virtue of and pursuant to the power vested in the National Labor
Relations Board by Section 9 (c) of the National Labor Relations
Act, 49 Stat. 449, and pursuant to Article III, Sections 8 and 9, of
National Labor Relations Board Rules and Regulations-Series 2,
as amended,
IT Is HEREBY cERTIFIED .that Federal Labor Union No. 18267, has been
designated and selected by, a majority of the production and mainte-
nance employees of The Steel Storage File Company, Cleveland,
Ohio, including' shipping room employees and group leaders, but ex-
cluding supervisory and office employees and the night foreman, as
their representative for, the purposes of collective bargaining, and
that, pursuant to Section 9 (a) of the National Labor Relations Act,
Federal Labor Union No. 18267, is the exclusive representative of all
such employees for the purposes of collective bargaining with respect
to rates of pay, wages, -hours of employment, and other conditions of
employment.
27 N. L. R B., No. 46a.