The Boeing CompanyDownload PDFNational Labor Relations Board - Unpublished Board DecisionsJun 17, 202010-CA-204795 (N.L.R.B. Jun. 17, 2020) Copy Citation UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BEFORE THE NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD THE BOEING COMPANY and Cases 10-CA-204795 10-CA-226718 INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF MACHINISTS 10-CA-227191 AND AEROSPACE WORKERS, AFL-CIO 10-CA-229378 10-CA-229979 10-CA-231035 10-CA-231815 10-CA-231853 10-CA-231888 10-CA-232626 10-CA-233509 10-CA-234519 10-CA-245435 ORDER Respondent The Boeing Company’s Motion to Dismiss in part the consolidated complaint is denied. The Respondent has not demonstrated that the complaint fails to state a claim upon which relief can be granted.1 In its motion, the Respondent also requests that the Board order the Regional Director to provide a bill of particulars regarding several of the complaint allegations. In accordance with Section 102.24 of the Board’s Rules and Regulations, the Respondent’s request for a bill of particulars should have been filed with the Division of Judges rather than the Board. However, on June 11, 2020, Administrative Law Judge Geoffrey Carter granted in part and denied in 1 Because the charge in Case 10-CA-204795 was held in abeyance rather than dismissed, the Acting Regional Director acted within his prosecutorial discretion under Sect. 3(d) of the Act in including the charge in the consolidated complaint. See Teamsters Local 385 (Walt Disney World Co.), 366 NLRB No. 96, slip op. at 1, n.3 (2018) (finding that Ducane Heating Corp., 273 NLRB 1389 (1985), enfd. 785 F.2d 304 (4th Cir. 1986), is inapplicable to charges held in abeyance). part the Respondent’s request and the Board has not received a request for special permission to appeal the judge’s order. Accordingly, the Respondent’s request for a bill of particulars is not before the Board. Dated, Washington, D.C., June 17, 2020. JOHN F. RING, CHAIRMAN MARVIN E. KAPLAN, MEMBER WILLIAM J. EMANUEL, MEMBER Copy with citationCopy as parenthetical citation