Tech Valley Printing

National Labor Relations Board - Board Decisions

Apr 30, 2008

352 N.L.R.B. 58 (N.L.R.B. 2008)

352 NLRB No. 58
1
NOTICE: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the
bound volumes of NLRB decisions. Readers are requested to notify the Ex-
ecutive Secretary, National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C.
20570, of any typographical or other formal errors so that corrections can
be included in the bound volumes.
General Business Supply, d/b/a Tech Valley Printing,
Inc. and New York Typographical Union, CWA
Local 14156. Case 3–CA–26521
April 30, 2008
DECISION AND ORDER
BY CHAIRMAN SCHAUMBER AND MEMBER LIEBMAN
The General Counsel seeks a default judgment in this
case on the ground that the Respondent has failed to file
an answer to the complaint. Upon a charge filed by the
Union on December 18, 2007, the General Counsel is-
sued the complaint on February 21, 2008, against Gen-
eral Business Supply, d/b/a Tech Valley Printing, Inc.,
the Respondent, alleging that it has violated Section
8(a)(5) and (1) of the Act. The Respondent failed to file
an answer.
On March 14, 2008, the General Counsel filed a Mo-
tion for Default Judgment with the Board. Thereafter, on
March 19, 2008, the Board issued an order transferring
the proceeding to the Board and a Notice to Show Cause
why the motion should not be granted. The Respondent
filed no response. The allegations in the motion are
therefore undisputed.
Ruling on Motion for Default Judgment1
Section 102.20 of the Board’s Rules and Regulations
provides that the allegations in the complaint shall be
deemed admitted if an answer is not filed within 14 days
from service of the complaint, unless good cause is
shown. In addition, the complaint affirmatively states
that the answer must be received by the Regional Office
on or before March 6, 2008, and that if no answer was
filed, the Board may find, pursuant to a motion for de-
fault judgment, that the allegations in the complaint are
true. By letter dated March 6, 2008, the Respondent’s
counsel notified the Regional Director that the Respon-
dent had ceased its operations, and that it was not in a
position to respond to the complaint.2 To date no answer
has been filed.

1 Effective midnight December 28, 2007, Members Liebman,
Schaumber, Kirsanow, and Walsh delegated to Members Liebman,
Schaumber, and Kirsanow, as a three-member group, all of the Board’s
powers in anticipation of the expiration of the terms of Members Kir-
sanow and Walsh on December 31, 2007. Pursuant to this delegation,
Chairman Schaumber and Member Liebman constitute a quorum of the
three-member group. As a quorum, they have the authority to issue
decisions and orders in unfair labor practice and representation cases.
See Sec. 3(b) of the Act.
2 Although no further reminder was sent to the Respondent after ser-
vice of the complaint, no such reminder was needed in light of the
In the absence of good cause being shown for the fail-
ure to file a timely answer, we grant the General Coun-
sel’s Motion for Default Judgment.
On the entire record, the Board makes the following
FINDINGS OF FACT
I. JURISDICTION
At all material times, the Respondent, a corporation
with an office and place of business in Watervliet, New
York, herein called the Watervliet, New York facility,
has been engaged in the business of commercial printing.
During the 12-month period preceding the issuance of
the complaint, the Respondent, in conducting its business
operations described above, purchased and received
goods and materials valued in excess of $50,000 directly
from points located outside the State of New York.
We find that the Respondent is an employer engaged
in commerce within the meaning of Section 2(2), (6), and
(7) of the Act and that New York Typographical Union,
CWA Local 14156, the Union, is a labor organization
within the meaning of Section 2(5) of the Act.
II. ALLEGED UNFAIR LABOR PRACTICES
At all material times, the following individuals held
the positions set forth opposite their respective names
and have been supervisors of the Respondent within the
meaning of Section 2(11) of the Act and agents of the
Respondent within the meaning of Section 2(13) of the
Act.
John Smith President
Nancy Fitorre Chief Financial Officer
The following employees of the Respondent constitute
a unit appropriate for the purposes of collective bargain-
ing within the meaning of Section 9(b) of the Act:
All pre-press operations, including but not limited to all
forms of desk top publishing and/or typesetting, includ-
ing make-up and design; the operation of computers,
software and related printers and/or copiers; the proof-
ing, correcting, and/or imposing of electronic text files;

notification to the Regional Director from the Respondent’s counsel
that the Respondent had ceased operations and was not in a position to
file an answer. Moreover, the failure to send a reminder letter does not
warrant the denial of a motion for default judgment. See, e.g., Superior
Industries, 289 NLRB 834, 835 fn. 13 (1988).
DECISIONS OF THE NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD2
the operations of cameras, plate-making equipment,
film processors and image setters; the paste-up of cam-
era-ready copy and stripping; the storage, retrieval and
record keeping of customer films and flats (otherwise
known as vault operations); the assembling, ordering
and/or proofing of material for all production work.
Also included are all clerical and general office work
associated with the day to day operations of the busi-
ness employed by Respondent at its Watervliet, New
York facility, excluding all other employees.
At all material times, the Union has been the desig-
nated exclusive collective-bargaining representative of
the unit and the Union has been recognized as the repre-
sentative by the Respondent. This recognition has been
embodied in successive collective-bargaining agree-
ments, the most recent of which is effective from July 1,
2006 through June 30, 2009.
At all material times, based on Section 9(a) of the Act,
the Union has been the exclusive collective-bargaining
representative of the unit.
Since about June 18, 2007, the Respondent failed to
remit to the Union dues that have been deducted from
employees’ wages, as required by article 3, section A of
the 2006–2009 collective-bargaining agreement.
Since around early December 2007, the Respondent
unilaterally changed the pay date for unit employees.
The subjects set forth above relate to wages, hours and
other terms and conditions of employment of the unit and
are mandatory subjects for the purpose of collective bar-
gaining. The Respondent engaged in the conduct de-
scribed above without prior notice to the Union and
without affording the Union an opportunity to bargain
with the Respondent with respect to this conduct and the
effects of this conduct.
CONCLUSION OF LAW
By the acts and conduct described above, the Respon-
dent has been failing and refusing to bargain collectively
and in good faith with the exclusive collective-
bargaining representative of its employees, and has
thereby engaged in unfair labor practices affecting com-
merce within the meaning of Section 8(a)(5) and (1) and
Section 2(6) and (7) of the Act.
REMEDY
Having found that the Respondent has engaged in cer-
tain unfair labor practices, we shall order it to cease and
desist and to take certain affirmative action designed to
effectuate the policies of the Act. Specifically, having
found that the Respondent has violated Section 8(a)(5)
and (1) by failing since June 18, 2007, to remit to the
Union all dues that have been deducted from employees’
wages, as required by article 3, section A of the Respon-
dent’s 2006–2009 collective-bargaining agreement, we
shall order the Respondent to forward the dues deducted
from employees to the Union as required by the 2006-
2009 agreement, with interest, as prescribed in New Ho-
rizons for the Retarded, 283 NLRB 1173 (1987).
In addition, having found that the Respondent violated
Section 8(a)(5) and (1) by unilaterally changing the pay
date for the employees in the unit around early December
2007, we shall order the Respondent to rescind the uni-
lateral change on request and make the unit employees
whole for any loss of earnings and other benefits they
may have suffered as a result of the Respondent’s unlaw-
ful conduct, in the manner set forth in Ogle Protection
Service, 183 NLRB 682 (1970), enfd. 444 F.2d 502 (6th
Cir. 1971), with interest, as prescribed in New Horizons
for the Retarded, supra.
Finally, in view of the fact that the Respondent has
ceased operations at its Watervliet, New York facility,
we shall order the Respondent to mail a copy of the at-
tached notice to the Union and to the last known ad-
dresses of the unit employees who were employed by the
Respondent since June 18, 2007, in order to inform them
of the outcome of this proceeding.
ORDER
The National Labor Relations Board orders that the
Respondent, General Business Supply, d/b/a Tech Valley
Printing, Inc., Watervliet, New York, its officers, agents,
successors, and assigns, shall
1. Cease and desist from
(a) Failing to bargain collectively and in good faith
with New York Typographical Union, CWA Local
14156, as the exclusive collective-bargaining representa-
tive of the employees in the unit set forth below by uni-
laterally changing the pay date for the employees in the
unit:
All pre-press operations, including but not limited to all
forms of desk top publishing and/or typesetting, includ-
ing make-up and design; the operation of computers,
software and related printers and/or copiers; the proof-
ing, correcting, and/or imposing of electronic text files;
the operations of cameras, plate-making equipment,
film processors and image setters; the paste-up of cam-
era-ready copy and stripping; the storage, retrieval and
record keeping of customer films and flats (otherwise
known as vault operations); the assembling, ordering
and/or proofing of material for all production work.
TECH VALLEY PRINTING 3
Also included are all clerical and general office work
associated with the day to day operations of the busi-
ness employed by Respondent at its Watervliet, New
York facility, excluding all other employees.
(b) Failing to remit to the Union dues that were de-
ducted from employees’ wages as required by article 3,
section A of the 2006–2009 collective-bargaining agree-
ment.
(c) In any like or related manner interfering with, re-
straining, or coercing employees in the exercise of the
rights guaranteed them by Section 7 of the Act.
2. Take the following affirmative action necessary to
effectuate the policies of the Act.
(a) On request, rescind the unlawful unilateral change
of the pay date for the employees in the unit.
(b) Make whole the employees for any loss of earnings
and other benefits resulting from the unlawful unilateral
change around early December 2007 of the pay date for
the unit employees, with interest, in the manner set forth
in the remedy section of this decision.
(c) Remit to the Union all dues that have been de-
ducted from employees’ wages, as required by article 3,
section A of the 2006–2009 collective-bargaining agree-
ment that have not been remitted since June 18, 2007,
with interest, in the manner set forth in the remedy sec-
tion of this decision.
(d) Preserve and, within 14 days of a request, or such
additional time as the Regional Director may allow for
good cause shown, provide at a reasonable place desig-
nated by the Board or its agents, all payroll records, so-
cial security payment records, timecards, personnel re-
cords and reports, and all other records including an elec-
tronic copy of such records if stored in electronic form,
necessary to analyze the amount of backpay due under
the terms of this Order.
(e) Within 14 days after service by the Region, dupli-
cate and mail, at its own expense and after being signed
by the Respondent’s authorized representative, copies of
the attached notice marked “Appendix”3 to the Union
and to all unit employees who were employed by the
Respondent at any time since June 18, 2007.

3 If this Order is enforced by a judgment of a United States court of
appeals, the words in the notice reading “Mailed by Order of the Na-
tional Labor Relations Board” shall read “Mailed Pursuant to a Judg-
ment of the United States Court of Appeals Enforcing an Order of the
National Labor Relations Board.”
(f) Within 21 days after service by the Region, file
with the Regional Director a sworn certification of a re-
sponsible official on a form provided by the Region at-
testing to the steps the Respondent has taken to comply.
Dated, Washington, D.C. April 30, 2008
___________________________________
Peter C. Schaumber, Chairman
___________________________________
Wilma B. Liebman, Member
(SEAL) NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD
APPENDIX
NOTICE TO EMPLOYEES
MAILED BY ORDER OF THE
NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD
An Agency of the United States Government
The National Labor Relations Board has found that we vio-
lated Federal labor law and has ordered us to mail and obey
this notice.
FEDERAL LAW GIVES YOU THE RIGHT TO
Form, join or assist a union
Choose representatives to bargain with us on
your behalf
Act together with other employees for your bene-
fit and protection
Choose not to engage in any of these protected
activities.
WE WILL NOT FAIL to bargain collectively and in good
faith with New York Typographical Union, CWA Local
14156, as the exclusive collective-bargaining representa-
tive of the employees in the unit set forth below by uni-
laterally changing the pay date for the employees in the
unit:
All pre-press operations, including but not limited to all
forms of desk top publishing and/or typesetting, includ-
ing make-up and design; the operation of computers,
software and related printers and/or copiers; the proof-
ing, correcting, and/or imposing of electronic text files;
the operations of cameras, plate-making equipment,
film processors and image setters; the paste-up of cam-
era-ready copy and stripping; the storage, retrieval and
record keeping of customer films and flats (otherwise
DECISIONS OF THE NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD4
known as vault operations); the assembling, ordering
and/or proofing of material for all production work.
Also included are all clerical and general office work
associated with the day to day operations of the busi-
ness employed by us at our Watervliet, New York fa-
cility, excluding all other employees.
WE WILL NOT fail to remit to the Union dues that were
deducted from employees’ wages, as required by article
3, section A of the 2006–2009 agreement.
WE WILL NOT in any like or related manner interfere
with, restrain, or coerce you in the exercise of the rights
guaranteed you by Section 7 of the Act.
WE WILL, on request, rescind our unlawful unilateral
change of the pay date for the employees in the unit and
WE WILL make whole our employees for any loss of earn-
ings and other benefits resulting from our unlawful uni-
lateral change around early December 2007 of the pay
date for the unit employees, with interest.
WE WILL remit to the Union all dues that have been
deducted from employees’ wages, as required by article
3, section A of the 2006–2009 collective-bargaining
agreement that have not been remitted since June 18,
2007, with interest.
GENERAL BUSINESS SUPPLY, D/B/A TECH
VALLEY PRINTING, INC.