Publications International, Ltd.Download PDFTrademark Trial and Appeal BoardMar 12, 2012No. 77910810 (T.T.A.B. Mar. 12, 2012) Copy Citation THIS OPINION IS NOT A PRECEDENT OF THE T.T.A.B. Mailed: March 12, 2012 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ________ Trademark Trial and Appeal Board ________ In re Publications International, Ltd. ________ Serial Nos. 77910810 and 77910816 _______ Jason A. Finestone of Shukat Arrow Hafer Weber & Herbsman LLP for Publications International, Ltd. Allison P. Schrody, Trademark Examining Attorney, Law Office 115 (John Lincoski, Managing Attorney). _______ Before Bucher, Holtzman and Wolfson, Administrative Trademark Judges. Opinion by Wolfson, Administrative Trademark Judge: Publications International, Ltd. (“applicant”) has filed an application for the standard character mark iCookbook for “Portable electronic device for receiving and reading text and images through wireless internet access and/or digital download and for displaying electronically published materials, namely, recipes” in International Serial Nos. 77910810 and 77910816 2 Class 91 and for “Providing information in the fields of cooking, namely, recipes via the internet; and providing a website featuring information in the fields of cooking, namely, recipes” in International Class 43.2 The examining attorney has refused registration of both marks under the provisions of Section 2(e)(1) of the Trademark Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1052(e)(1), on the ground that iCookbook is “merely descriptive of the identified goods and services.” Examining Attorney’s Brief, (unnumbered) p. 1. Upon final refusal of registration, applicant filed a timely appeal. Both applicant and the examining attorney filed briefs. For the reasons discussed below, we affirm the refusal to register. A mark is considered merely descriptive if it describes an ingredient, quality, characteristic, function, feature, purpose, or use of the specified goods or services. In re Engineering Systems Corp., 2 USPQ2d 1075, 1076 (TTAB 1986); In re Bright-Crest, Ltd., 204 USPQ 591 (TTAB 1979). The determination of whether a mark is merely descriptive must be made not in the abstract but in relation to the goods or services for which registration is 1 Ser. No. 77910810; filed January 13, 2010, on the basis of applicant’s bona fide intent to use the mark in commerce. 2 Ser. No. 77910816; filed January 13, 2010, on the basis of applicant’s bona fide intent to use the mark in commerce. Serial Nos. 77910810 and 77910816 3 sought, the context in which the mark is used, and the impact that it is likely to make on the average purchaser of such goods or services. In re Abcor Development Corp., 588 F.2d 811, 200 USPQ 215, 218 (CCPA 1978). With her first Office action, the examining attorney submitted a printout from an online dictionary, defining “cookbook” as “a book containing recipes and other information about the preparation of food.”3 With her Final Office action, the examining attorney submitted online dictionary definitions of “book,” “e-book,” and “audio book.”4 The submitted definition of “book” includes: “2. Published work: a published work of literature, science, or reference, or a work intended for publication.”5 Further, as shown by the pages from applicant’s website, applicant provides an application for the Apple iPad containing recipes.6 Thus, applicant’s “portable electronic 3 At http://education.yahoo.com; accessed April 13, 2010. 4 The term “e-book” is defined as: “a book composed in or converted to digital format for display on a computer screen or handheld device.” At http://www.merriam-webster.com; accessed November 4, 2010. The term “audio book” is defined as: “recorded book: a commercial recording, usually on a cassette tape, of somebody reading the text of a popular book.” At http://encarta.msn.com; accessed November 4, 2010. 5 At http://encarta.msn.com; accessed November 4, 2010. 6 At http://pilapps.com/cookbook/; accessed on May 25, 2011. The website describes applicant’s iCookbook application as “the only cooking app and recipe app that an everyday cook will ever need. [T]he iCookbook app includes more than 2,000 recipes selected by accredited food editors … .” Serial Nos. 77910810 and 77910816 4 device” for displaying recipes, and applicant’s service of providing recipes via a website featuring recipes, fit within the definition of a cookbook and providing a cookbook over the Internet. The examining attorney also submitted evidence showing that the prefix “I” is commonly recognized as an abbreviation for “Internet” when used in connection with computer-related goods or services. She filed an entry from “Acronym Finder,”7 indicating that her search of “What does I stand for?” returned 46 meanings, one of which was “Internet.” Results were sorted alphabetically. The examining attorney also submitted copies of several registrations including the letter “I” as part of the mark that have issued on the Supplemental Register. It is well settled that third-party registrations, while not proving that the marks depicted therein are in use, can be used in the manner of dictionary definitions, in order to show that a term has been adopted because it has a significance in a particular industry. In re Max Capital Group Ltd., 93 USPQ2d 1243 (TTAB 2010); see also, In re Country Music Association, Inc., 100 USPQ2d 1824, 1833 (TTAB 2011)(third- party registrations show the Office’s consistent treatment of the word “association” as a generic term when used in 7 At http://www.acronymfinder.com; accessed April 13, 2010. Serial Nos. 77910810 and 77910816 5 connection with association services that promote country music). Here, the Supplemental Register registrations show that the Office has consistently treated marks containing the prefix “I” and an additional descriptive or generic portion to be merely descriptive of Internet-related goods and services, as indicated in the examples below: IPORTAL for “computer software … that allows customers to check order status, … enter new orders, enter repeat orders, and obtain order acknowledgments, through a secure Internet environment.”8 IBADGE for “computer software, accessed through the Internet, for creating, managing and printing identification badges.”9 IWORDS for “downloadable audio files featuring educational programs via the Internet” in class 9; “educational services, namely, providing online streaming audio programs in the field of language arts via the Internet.”10 Finally, the examining attorney submitted copies of snapshots of web pages to show third-party usages of “Internet Cookbook” to describe an online collection of recipes. Examples of these include: Virtual Cities’ Internet cookbook with more than 6,000 Recipes11 8 Reg. No. 2606181. 9 Reg. No. 2907400. 10 Reg. No. 3826583. 11 At http://www.virtualcities.com. Snapshot of the page as it appeared on April 6, 2010, accessed April 13, 2010. http://glindharrison.com; accessed April 13, 2010. Serial Nos. 77910810 and 77910816 6 1st Traveler’s choice Internet Cookbook. A selection of recipes from across America, many from bed and breakfast inns12 Archive for the ‘The Internet Cookbook’ category The Internet Cookbook - Five Favorites13 Internet Cookbook Collection: 28 Cookbooks with Master Resale Rights or Private Label Rights Cooking & Recipes.14 Nikki’s Internet Cookbook15 Internet cookbook: from Larousse Gastronomique to 4 Ingredients by Rachel McAlpine16 Based upon the definitions found in Acronym Finder and the other online dictionaries, the third-party registrations, and the web pages for “internet cookbooks,” we find that the prefix “I” is commonly defined as a shorthand for “Internet.” Applicant argues that when Apple launched the iMac in 1998, “Apple Computers explained that the ‘i’ stood not only for ‘Internet,’ but also for ‘individual,’ ‘instruct,’ 12 At http://www.cooksmarter.net. Snapshot of the page as it appeared on April 6, 2010, accessed April 13, 2010. 13 At http://glindharrison.com. Snapshot of the page as it appeared on January 26, 2010; accessed April 13, 2010. 14 At http://mentaltraining.onyourweb.net/guides/89-cooking- recipes/4237-internet-cookbook-collection-28-cookbooks-with- master-resale-rights-or-private-label-rights-cooking- recipes.html. Snapshot of the page as it appeared on October 28, 2010; accessed November 4, 2010. 15 At http://nikkisinternetcookbook.postercus.com. Snapshot of the page as it appeared on October 27, 2010; accessed November 4, 2010. 16 At http://contented.com. Snapshot of the page as it appeared on May 19, 2011; accessed May 25, 2011. Serial Nos. 77910810 and 77910816 7 ‘inform’ and ‘inspire.’”17 Applicant further contends that Apple has released a number of products that do not contain a direct Internet component yet uses the “i” prefix as part of the product brand name, and that several unrelated companies have registered marks containing the “i” or “I” prefix for non-Internet-related products. Because applicant has not made any of these alleged registrations of record, we have not considered them. The Board does not take judicial notice of registrations that reside in the USPTO. In re Jonathan Drew, Inc. d/b/a Drew Estate, 97 USPQ2d 1640, 1646 n.11 (TTAB 2011). Applicant has also submitted copies of packaging of five products to show that “companies other than Apple” use marks containing the prefix “i” or “I” for non-Internet related goods. These copies have not been verified and there is no evidence that the goods shown in the pages are not actually used in connection with the Internet. Even assuming that these marks -- iGO for a universal wall charger, iHOME for an alarm clock, ILIVE for a speaker dock system, iSPLITTER for a splitter and iCABLE for cables -- are not used in connection with the Internet, the fact that a term may have different meanings in other contexts is not controlling on the question of descriptiveness. In re Chopper Indus., 17 Applicant’s Brief, unnumbered p. 2. Serial Nos. 77910810 and 77910816 8 222 USPQ 258, 259 (TTAB 1984); In re Bright-Crest, Ltd., 204 USPQ at 593. That others may apparently use the prefix “i” or “I” in other contexts is immaterial. Applicant has combined the prefix “i” with the descriptive term “cookbook” to create a mark that immediately conveys information about its goods and services, namely, that the goods are portable devices used for accessing recipes online, and the services are the provision of websites featuring online recipes. When two descriptive terms are combined, and the combination of terms fails to evoke a new and unique commercial impression apart from the descriptive terms involved, the combination results in a composite that is itself descriptive. In re Cox Enters. Inc., 82 USPQ2d 1040 (TTAB 2007)(THEATL – a compressed version of the term “THE ATL,” a recognized nickname for the city of Atlanta, held merely descriptive of printed matter featuring news and information about Atlanta, Georgia); In re Finisar Corp., 78 USPQ2d 1618 (TTAB 2006), aff’d per curiam, 223 Fed. App’x 984 (Fed. Cir. 2007) (SMARTSFP held merely descriptive of optical transceivers); In re Tower Tech, Inc., 64 USPQ2d 1314, 1317-18 (TTAB 2002) (SMARTTOWER held merely descriptive of highly automated cooling towers). Serial Nos. 77910810 and 77910816 9 As shown by the evidence of record, the combination iCookbook has no other unique or incongruous meaning in relation to applicant’s recited goods and services apart from the descriptive significance of the two separate terms themselves. Decision: The refusal to register under Section 2(e)(1) is affirmed. Copy with citationCopy as parenthetical citation