Publication Printing Co.

National Labor Relations Board - Board Decisions

Feb 11, 2008

352 N.L.R.B. 12 (N.L.R.B. 2008)

352 NLRB No. 12
NOTICE: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the
bound volumes of NLRB decisions. Readers are requested to notify the Ex-
ecutive Secretary, National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C.
20570, of any typographical or other formal errors so that corrections can
be included in the bound volumes.
The Publication Printing Company and Trustees of
Graphic Arts Pension Plan and Local 6-505M,
Graphic Communications Conference of the In-
ternational Brotherhood of Teamsters. Cases
14–CA–29046 and 14–CA–29071
February 11, 2008
DECISION AND ORDER
BY MEMBERS LIEBMAN AND SCHAUMBER
The General Counsel seeks a default judgment in this
case on the ground that the Respondent has failed to file
an answer to the complaint. Upon charges and amended
charges filed by Trustees of Graphic Arts Pension Plan
(the Trustees) and Local 6-505M, Graphic Communica-
tions Conference of the International Brotherhood of
Teamsters (the Union), the General Counsel issued a
complaint on October 31, 2007, against The Publication
Printing Company (the Respondent), alleging that it has
violated Section 8(a)(5) and (1) of the Act by unilaterally
ceasing to make pension fund contributions on behalf of
employees and withhold employees’ 401(k) plan contri-
butions from their paychecks. The Respondent failed to
file an answer.
On December 13, 2007, the General Counsel filed a
Motion for Default Judgment with the Board. Thereaf-
ter, on December 19, 2007, the Board issued an order
transferring the proceeding to the Board and a Notice to
Show Cause why the motion should not be granted. The
Respondent filed no response. The allegations in the
motion are therefore undisputed.
Ruling on Motion for Default Judgment1
Section 102.20 of the Board’s Rules and Regulations
provides that the allegations in the complaint shall be
deemed admitted if an answer is not filed within 14 days
from service of the complaint, unless good cause is
shown. In addition, the complaint affirmatively stated
that the answer must be received by November 14, 2007,
or a motion for default judgment may be filed. Further,
the undisputed allegations in the General Counsel’s mo-
tion disclose that the Region, by letter dated November

1 Effective midnight December 28, 2007, Members Liebman,
Schaumber, Kirsanow, and Walsh delegated to Members Liebman,
Schaumber, and Kirsanow, as a three-member group, all of the Board’s
powers in anticipation of the expiration of the terms of Members Kir-
sanow and Walsh on December 31, 2007. Pursuant to this delegation,
Members Liebman and Schaumber constitute a quorum of the three-
member group. As a quorum, they have the authority to issue decisions
and orders in unfair labor practice and representation cases. See Sec.
3(b) of the Act.
19, 2007, advised the Respondent that unless an answer
was received by November 26, 2007, a motion for de-
fault judgment would be filed.
In the absence of good cause being shown for the fail-
ure to file a timely answer, we grant the General Coun-
sel’s motion for default judgment.
On the entire record, the Board makes the following
FINDINGS OF FACT
I. JURISDICTION
At all material times, the Respondent, a Missouri cor-
poration with a facility in St. Louis, Missouri, has been
engaged in the business of printing and binding of peri-
odicals, publications, and books. During the 12-month
period ending September 30, 2007, the Respondent, in
conducting its business operations described above, pur-
chased and received at its St. Louis, Missouri facility
goods valued in excess of $50,000 directly from points
outside the State of Missouri.
During the 12-month period ending September 30,
2007, the Respondent, in conducting its business opera-
tions described above, sold and shipped from its St.
Louis, Missouri facility goods valued in excess of
$50,000 directly to points outside the State of Missouri.
During the 12-month period ending September 30,
2007, the Respondent, in conducting its business opera-
tions described above, provided services valued in excess
of $50,000 for enterprises within the State of Missouri,
all of which are directly engaged in interstate commerce.
During the 12-month period ending September 30,
2007, the Respondent, in conducting its business opera-
tions described above, purchased and received at its St.
Louis, Missouri facility goods valued in excess of
$50,000 from other enterprises located within the State
of Missouri, all of which had received these goods di-
rectly from points outside the State of Missouri.
We find that the Respondent is an employer engaged
in commerce within the meaning of Section 2(2), (6), and
(7) of the Act and that the Union is a labor organization
within the meaning of Section 2(5) of the Act.
II. ALLEGED UNFAIR LABOR PRACTICES
At all material times, the following individuals held
the positions set forth opposite their respective names
and have been supervisors of the Respondent within the
meaning of Section 2(11) of the Act and agents of the
Respondent within the meaning of Section 2(13) of the
Act:
James Burton President/Secretary
Brian Wade Co-owner
The unit of the Respondent’s employees, as set forth in
the collective-bargaining agreement described below (the
DECISIONS OF THE NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD2
unit), is a unit appropriate for the purpose of collective
bargaining within the meaning of Section 9(b) of the Act.
Since about 1950 and at all material times, based on
Section 9(a) of the Act, the Union has been the desig-
nated exclusive collective-bargaining representative of
the unit and has been recognized as such by the Respon-
dent. This recognition has been embodied in successive
collective-bargaining agreements, the most recent of
which was effective by its terms from March 6, 2001, to
April 1, 2007.
At all material times since 1950, based on Section 9(a)
of the Act, the Union has been the exclusive collective-
bargaining representative of the unit.
Since about April 1, 2007, the Respondent has ceased
making pension fund contributions on behalf of the unit
employees.
Since about June 2007, the Respondent has ceased
withholding unit employees’ contributions to the 401(k)
plan from their paychecks.
The subjects set forth above relate to wages, hours, and
other terms and conditions of employment of the unit and
are mandatory subjects of bargaining.
The Respondent engaged in the conduct described
above without prior notice to the Union and without af-
fording the Union an opportunity to bargain with the
Respondent with respect to this conduct and/or without
first bargaining with the Union to a good-faith impasse.
CONCLUSION OF LAW
By the acts and conduct described above, the Respon-
dent has been failing and refusing to bargain collectively
and in good faith with the exclusive collective-
bargaining representative of its unit employees, and has
thereby engaged in unfair labor practices affecting com-
merce within the meaning of Section 8(a)(5) and (1) and
Section 2(6) and (7) of the Act.
REMEDY
Having found that the Respondent has engaged in cer-
tain unfair labor practices, we shall order it to cease and
desist and to take certain affirmative action designed to
effectuate the policies of the Act. Specifically, having
found that the Respondent violated Section 8(a)(5) and
(1) by unilaterally ceasing to make pension fund contri-
butions on behalf of the unit employees since April 1,
2007, we shall order the Respondent to make whole its
unit employees by making all such delinquent pension
fund contributions on behalf of the unit employees that
have not been made since April 1, 2007, including any
additional amounts due the funds in accordance with
Merryweather Optical Co., 240 NLRB 1213, 1216 fn. 7
(1979).2 We shall also order the Respondent to reim-
burse unit employees for any expenses ensuing from its
failure to make the required contributions, as set forth in
Kraft Plumbing & Heating, 252 NLRB 891 fn. 2 (1980),
enfd. mem. 661 F.2d 940 (9th Cir. 1981), such amounts
to be computed in the manner set forth in Ogle Protec-
tion Service, 183 NLRB 682 (1970), enfd. 444 F.2d 502
(6th Cir. 1971), with interest as prescribed in New Hori-
zons for the Retarded, 283 NLRB 1173 (1987).
In addition, having found that the Respondent violated
Section 8(a)(5) and (1) by unilaterally ceasing to with-
hold unit employees’ contributions to the 401(k) plan
from their paychecks, we shall order the Respondent to
resume withholding the required employee contributions
to the 401(k) plan from employee paychecks and to make
any required employee contributions to the 401(k) plan
that have not been made since June 2007, including any
additional amounts due the plan in accordance with Mer-
ryweather Optical Co., supra, and to make the unit em-
ployees whole for any loss of interest they may have suf-
fered as a result of the Respondent’s failure to make such
contributions.3
Further, we shall order the Respondent, on request, to
bargain in good faith with the Union regarding pension
fund contributions and the withholding of employee con-
tributions to the 401(k) plan.
ORDER
The National Labor Relations Board orders that the
Respondent, The Publication Printing Company, St.
Louis, Missouri, its officers, agents, successors, and as-
signs, shall
1. Cease and desist from
(a) Failing and refusing to bargain collectively and in
good faith with Local 6-505M, Graphic Communications
Conference of the International Brotherhood of Team-
sters (the Union), as the exclusive collective-bargaining
representative of the employees in the unit described in
the most recent collective-bargaining agreement effective
from March 6, 2001, to April 1, 2007, by ceasing to
make pension fund contributions on behalf of the unit
employees since April 1, 2007, and by ceasing to with-
hold unit employees’ contributions to the 401(k) plan
from their paychecks since June 2007.

2 To the extent that an employee has made personal contributions to
a benefit or other fund that have been accepted by the fund in lieu of
the Respondent’s delinquent contributions to the pension fund and/or
401(k) plan during the period of the delinquency, the Respondent will
reimburse the employee, but the amount of such reimbursement will
constitute a setoff to any amount that the Respondent otherwise owes
the fund.
3 See fn. 2, supra.
PUBLICATION PRINTING CO. 3
(b) In any like or related manner interfering with, re-
straining, or coercing employees in the exercise of the
rights guaranteed them by Section 7 of the Act.
2. Take the following affirmative action necessary to
effectuate the policies of the Act.
(a) On request, bargain with the Union as the exclusive
representative of the employees in the unit described in
the most recent collective-bargaining agreement effective
from March 6, 2001, to April 1, 2007, with respect to
pension fund contributions and withholding of employee
contributions to the 401(k) plan until agreement or a
good-faith impasse is reached, and reduce to writing and
sign any agreement reached as a result of such bargain-
ing.
(b) Make all the delinquent pension fund contributions
on behalf of the unit employees that have not been made
since April 1, 2007, including any additional amounts
due the funds, in the manner set forth in the remedy sec-
tion of this decision.
(c) Make the unit employees whole for any expenses
ensuing from the Respondent’s failure to make the re-
quired pension fund contributions, with interest, in the
manner set forth in the remedy section of this decision.
(d) Resume withholding employee contributions to the
401(k) plan from employee paychecks and make any
required employee contributions to the 401(k) plan that
have not been made since June 2007, including any addi-
tional amounts due the plan, in the manner set forth in
the remedy section of this decision.
(e) Make the unit employees whole for any loss of in-
terest they may have suffered as a result of the Respon-
dent’s failure to withhold the 401(k) contributions since
June 2007, in the manner set forth in the remedy section
of this decision.
(f) Preserve and, within 14 days of a request, or such
additional time as the Regional Director may allow for
good cause shown, provide at a reasonable place desig-
nated by the Board or its agents, all payroll records, so-
cial security payment records, timecards, personnel re-
cords and reports, and all other records including an elec-
tronic copy of such records if stored in electronic form,
necessary to analyze the amount of backpay due under
the terms of this Order.
(g) Within 14 days after service by the Region, post at
its facility in St. Louis, Missouri, copies of the attached
notice marked “Appendix.”4 Copies of the notice, on

4 If this Order is enforced by a judgment of a United States court of
appeals, the words in the notice reading “Posted By Order of the Na-
tional Labor Relations Board” shall read “Posted Pursuant to a Judg-
ment of the United States Court of Appeals Enforcing an Order of the
National Labor Relations Board.”
forms provided by the Regional Director for Region 14,
after being signed by the Respondent’s authorized repre-
sentative, shall be posted by the Respondent and main-
tained for 60 consecutive days in conspicuous places
including all places where notices to employees are cus-
tomarily posted. Reasonable steps shall be taken by the
Respondent to ensure that the notices are not altered,
defaced, or covered by any other material. In the event
that, during the pendency of these proceedings, the Re-
spondent has gone out of business or closed the facility
involved in these proceedings, the Respondent shall du-
plicate and mail, at its own expense, a copy of the notice
to all current employees and former employees employed
by the Respondent at any time since April 1, 2007.
(h) Within 21 days after service by the Region, file
with the Regional Director a sworn certification of a re-
sponsible official on a form provided by the Region at-
testing to the steps that the Respondent has taken to
comply.
Dated, Washington, D.C. February 11, 2008
Wilma B. Liebman, Member
Peter C. Schaumber, Member
(SEAL) NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD
APPENDIX
NOTICE TO EMPLOYEES
POSTED BY ORDER OF THE
NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD
An Agency of the United States Government
The National Labor Relations Board has found that we vio-
lated Federal labor law and has ordered us to post and obey
this notice.
FEDERAL LAW GIVES YOU THE RIGHT TO
Form, join, or assist a union
Choose representatives to bargain with us on
your behalf
Act together with other employees for your bene-
fit and protection
Choose not to engage in any of these protected
activities.
WE WILL NOT fail and refuse to bargain collectively
and in good faith with Local 6-505M, Graphic Commu-
nications Conference of the International Brotherhood of
Teamsters (the Union), as the exclusive collective-
DECISIONS OF THE NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD4
bargaining representative of the employees in the unit
described in our most recent collective-bargaining
agreement with the Union effective from March 6, 2001,
to April 1, 2007, by ceasing to make pension fund con-
tributions on behalf of the unit employees, or by ceasing
to withhold unit employees’ contributions to the 401(k)
plan from their paychecks.
WE WILL NOT in any like or related manner interfere
with, restrain, or coerce you in the exercise of the rights
guaranteed you by Section 7 of the Act.
WE WILL, on request, bargain with the Union as the
exclusive collective-bargaining representative of the em-
ployees in the unit described in our most recent collec-
tive-bargaining agreement with the Union effective from
March 6, 2001, to April 1, 2007, with respect to pension
fund contributions and withholding of employee contri-
butions to the 401(k) plan until agreement or a good-faith
impasse is reached, and WE WILL reduce to writing and
sign any agreement reached as a result of such bargain-
ing.
WE WILL make all the delinquent pension fund contri-
butions on behalf of the unit employees that have not
been made since April 1, 2007, including any additional
amounts due the funds.
WE WILL make the unit employees whole for any ex-
penses ensuing from our failure to make the required
pension fund contributions, with interest.
WE WILL resume withholding employee contributions
to the 401(k) plan from employee paychecks and WE
WILL make any required employee contributions to the
401(k) plan that have not been made since June 2007,
including any additional amounts due the plan.
WE WILL make the unit employees whole for any loss
of interest they may have suffered as a result of our fail-
ure to withhold the 401(k) contributions since June 2007.
THE PUBLICATION PRINTING COMPANY