Plymouth Cordage Co.

National Labor Relations Board - Board Decisions

Mar 11, 1963

141 N.L.R.B. 351 (N.L.R.B. 1963)

FLORIDA AGRICCLTURAL SUPPLY COMPANY ETC. 351
other persons, Respondent Unions. Respondent Association, and Respondent Em-
ploye;s and each of them have engaged in. and are engag,ng in, unfair labor prac-
tices within the meaning of Section 8(e) of the Act
4 The aforesaid unfair labor practices are unfair labor practices affecting com-
merce within the meaning of Section 2(6) and (7) of the Act.
(Recommended Order omitted from publication.]
Florida Agricultural Supply Company, a division of Plymouth
Cordage Company and United Transpcrt Service Employees,
AFL-CIO, Local 3000 . C't.se 1'o. Jlulcla 71. 196.3
DECISION AND ORDER
This proceeding is brought under Section 10(b) of the National
Labor Relations Act. Upon a charge filed by Local 3000, United
Transport Service Employees, AFL-!'I0, herein called the Union,
the General Counsel of the National Labor Relations Board by the
Regional Director for the Twelfth Region issued a complaint dated
October 19, 1962, against Florida Agricultural Supply Company, a
division of Plymouth Cordage Company, herein called Respondent,
alleging that Respondent had engaged in and was engaging III unfair
labor practices affecting commerce within the meaning of Section
8(a) (1) and (5) and Section 2(6) and (7) of the National Labor
Relations Act, as amended. Copies of the charge, complaint, and
notice of hearing were duly served upon Respondent.
With respect to the unfair labor practices, the complaint alleges,
in substance, that on August 17, 1962. the Regional Director for the
Twelfth Region issued a certification in Case No. 12-RC-1455' desig-
nating the Union as the exclusive collective-bargaining representative
of a unit of employees at the Respondent's insecticides plaint ill Jack-
sonville, Florida; that on August 23, 1962, and at various tunes there-
after, the Union has requested Respondent to bargain collectively with
respect, to rates of pay, wages, hours of employment, and other terms
and conditions of employment, as the exclusive collective-barganning
representative of the employees in the certified unit; and that on
Sep'eml'er 21, 1962, and all times thereafter, Respondent unlawfully
rei'used to bargain collectively with the Union as the collective-
bargaining representative of all employees in the aforesaid unit.
Thereafter, Respondent filed an answer denying material allegations
of the complaint, and also denying that it unlawfully refused to
bargain.
On October 26, 1962, all parties to this proceeding entered into a
stipulation and jointly requested the transfer of this proceeding
directly to the Board for findings of fact, conclusions of law, and is-
Not published in NLRB volumes
141 NLRB No. 22.
352 DECISIONS OF NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD
suance of a decision and order based thereon. In the stipulation the,
parties agreed that the stipulation of facts together with the charge,,
complaint, answer, and the record in Case No. 12-RC-1455 should
constitute the entire record in this case. The parties further stipu-
lated that they waived a hearing before a Trial Examiner, the making
of findings of facts and conclusions of law by a Trial Examiner, and
the issuance of an Intermediate Report and Recommended Order.
On November 7, 1962, the Board issued an order approving the
stipulation and making it a part of the record herein, and transferring
the case to the Board for a decision and order. Thereafter, on De-
cember 6, 1962, the aforesaid parties entered into a supplemental
stipulation, requesting that the Board accept said stipulation as a
supplement to the previous stipulation filed herein. On December 10,
1962, the Board issued an order approving the supplemental stipula-
tion and making it likewise a part of the record herein. Thereafter,
the Respondent filed a brief with the Board.
Pursuant to the provisions of Section 3(b) of the National Labor
Relations Act, the Board has delegated its powers in connection with
this case to a three-member panel [Chairman McCulloch and Members
Fanning and Brown].
Upon the basis of the stipulation, supplemental stipulation, and the
entire record in the case, including the Respondent's brief, the Board
makes the following :
FINDINGS OF FACT
I. THE BUSINESS OF THE RESPONDENT
Respondent is now, and has been at all times material herein, a
Massachusetts corporation, licensed to do business in Florida, and is
engaged in the manufacture of insecticides at its Jacksonville, Flor-
ida, plant. During the last 12 months the Respondent has received
in excess of $50,000 worth of goods, supplies, and materials, for manu-
facturing operations at its Jacksonville, Florida, plant, directly from
points outside the State of Florida.
The Respondent admits, and we find, that it is, and has been at all
times material herein, an Employer engaged in commerce within the
meaning of Section 2 (6) and (7) of the Act.
H. THE LABOR ORGANIZATION INVOLVED
The Union is, and has been at all times material herein, a labor
organization within the meaning of Section 2(5) of the Act.
III. THE ALLEGED UNFAIR LABOR PRACTICES
On May 4, 1962, the Florida Agricultural Supply Company Work-
ers' Union, Independent, filed a petition in Case No. 12-RC-1455 seek-
FLORIDA AGRICULTURAL SUPPLY COMPANY, ETC. 353
ing to represent a unit of employees at the Respondent's Jacksonville,
Florida, plant, Hearing on this petition was held on May 18, 1962,
and on July 23, 1962, the Board issued a Decision and Direction of
Election, directing the Regional Director for the Twelfth Region to
conduct an election in the following unit :
All employees at the Employer's Jacksonville, Florida, plant,
including local drivers, mechanics, and seasonal employees who
have already worked 10 weeks and are presently employed and
those who have a reasonable expectancy of working 10 weeks dur-
ing the present season, but excluding all other seasonal employ-
ees, over-the-road drivers, office clericals, salesmen, chemists, lab-
oratory technicians, guards, and all other supervisors as defined
in the Act.
On August 9, 1962, an election was held in the above unit. The
Union (Intervenor in the representation case) received a majority of
the votes cast in that election. On August 17, 1962, the Union was
certified as the collective-bargaining representative of the employees
in this unit. On August 23, 1962, and at various times thereafter, the
Union made requests to the Respondent for collective bargaining with
respect to employees in the certified unit. On September 21, 1962, and
at all times thereafter, Respondent refused to recognize and bargain
collectively with the Union because the certified unit included, among
the other employees, two mechanics, William H. Walton and Bobby D.
Goolsby. The Respondent's refusal to bargain gave rise to the instant
proceeding.
It is the Respondent's contention that it did not commit unfair labor
practices by refusing to bargain as to Walton and Goolsby because
said mechanics are supervisors and should have been excluded from
the appropriate unit. This same contention was made by the Re-
spondent in the representation proceeding, but was there rejected by
the Board.
As was found by the Board in the representation proceeding (Case
No. 12-RC-1455), the record therein shows that Walton spends about
70 percent of his time doing general maintenance work. He spends
25 percent of his time in seasonal supervisory duties. Walton takes
on these supervisory duties during Respondent's peak season which
lasts from April to August, at which time Walton has full supervision
over some five employees. His pay is comparable to that of other f ore-
men. Five percent of Walton's time is spent substituting for the
mechanic foreman in the latter's absence because of illness or vacation.
Goolsby performs the same type of mechanical work as Walton, and
he also is expected to serve as a foreman during the peak season. He
is paid 10 to 15 percent more than the average production employee.
354 DECISIONS OF NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD
The Board said of Walton and Goolsby in its Decision and Direction
of Election :
As they perform rank and file functions for most of the year
and are expected to serve regularly as supervisors only during
peak seasons, we shall include them in the unit with respect to
their rank and file duties. The Great lTeste. n Sugar Company,
137 NLRB 551.
The Respondent's defense herein is concerned solely with the
Board's original unit determination. It appears from the record
that, aside from a supplemental stipulation 2 entered into by the parties
on December 6, 1962, the respondent has raised no matter not pre-
viously considered and rejected by the Board in the aforementioned
representation proceeding. The Boar(? has considered the evidence
contained in the supplemental stipulation and finds it to be insufficient
to justify -a redetermination of the appropriate unit.
As the Respondent admittedly refused to bargain with the I`nion
for all employees in the appropriate unit on and after September 21,
1962, we find that the Respondent has violated Section 8(a) (5) and
(1) of the Act.
IV. THE EFFECT OF TIIE UNFAIR LABOR PRACTICES UPON COMMERCE
The Respondent's refusal to bargain, set forth in section III, above,
occurring in connection with the operations of the Respondent set
forth in section I, has a close, intimate, and substantial relationship
to trade, traffic, and commerce among the several States, and tends
to lead to labor disputes burdening and obstructing the free flow of
commerce.
V. TIIE REMEDY
1-laving found that the Respondent has engaged in unfair labor
practices within the meaning of Section 8(a) (5) and (1) of the Act,
we shall order that it cease and desist therefrom and take certain
affirmative action to effectuate the policies of the Act.
Upon the basis of the foregoing findings of fact, and upon the entire
record in this case, the Board makes the following:
CoNCLusroxS of L.A1V
1. The Union is a labor organization within the meaning of Section
2(5) of the Act.
2. The Respondent is in employer within the meaning of Section
2(2) of the _Act, and is engage diii commerce and in operations affect-
ing commerce within the meaning of Section 2(6) and (7) of the Act.
2 The supplemental stipulation recites that the wages and benefits received by Walton
and Goolsby aie the game during the entie year, whether they aie acting as supervisors
during the peak season of the year, or whether they are performing duties as mechanics
during the rest of the year.
FLORIDA AGRICULTURAL SUPPLY COMIPAN Y, ETC. 355
3. All employees at the Respondent's Jacksonville, Florida, plant,
including local drivers, mechanics, and seasonal employees who have
already worked 10 weeks and are presently employed, and those who
have a reasonable expectancy of working 10 weeks during the present
season, but excluding all other seasonal employees, over-the-road
drivers, office clericals, salesmen, chemists, laboratory technicians,
guards, and all supervisors as defined in the Act, constitute a unit
appropriate for the purpose of collective bargaining within the mean-
ing of Section 9 (b) of the Act.
4. At all tunes since August 17, 1962, the Union has been and con-
tinues to be the exclusive bargaining representative of all the employees
in the aforementioned unit for the purpose of collective bargaining
within the meaning of Section 9(c) of the Act.
5. By refusing, on and after September 21, 1962, to bargain collec-
tively with the Onion as the exclusive representative of all the em-
ployees in the aforesaid unit, the Respondent has engaged in and is
engaging in unfair labor practices within the meaning of Section
8(a) (5) of the Act.
6. By refusing to bargain with the Union, the Respondent has
interfered with, restrained, and coerced its employees in the exercise
of rights guaranteed in Section 7 of the Act, thereby engaging in an
unfair labor practice within the meaning of Section 8(a) (1) of the
Act.
ORDER
Upon the entire record in this case , and pursuant to Section 10(c)
of the National Labor Relations Act, as amended, the National Labor
Relations Board hereby orders that the Respondent. Florida Agricul-
tural Supply Company , Division of Plymouth Cordage Company, its
officers, agents , successors , and assigns , sliall
1. Cease and desist from :
(a) Refusing to bargain with United Transport Service Employees,
AFL-CIO, Local 3000 , as the exclusive representative of all employees
in the above -described appropriate unit.
(b) In any like or related manner interfering with the efforts of
the above -named labor organization to bargain collectively.
2. Take the following affirmative action which the Board finds will
effectuate the policies of the Act :
(a) Upon request , bargain collectively with United Transport
Service Employees , AFL-CIO, Local 3000, as the exclusive bargain-
ing representative of all the employees in the aforesaid appropriate
unit, including William H. Walton and Bobby D. Goolsby , with re-
spect to wages , rates of pay, hours of employment , or other conditions
of employment , and if an understanding is reached , embody such
understanding in a signed agreement.
708-006-64-vol. 141-24
356 DECISIONS OF NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD
(b) Post at its insecticides plant in Jacksonville, Florida, copies
of the attached notice marked "Appendix." I Copies of said notice,
to be furnished by the Regional Director for the Twelfth Region,
shall, after being duly signed by the Respondent's representative, be
posted by the Respondent immediately upon receipt thereof and be
maintained by it for a period of 60 consecutive days thereafter in
conspicuous places, including all places where notices to its employees
are customarily posted. Reasonable steps shall be taken by the Re-
spondent to insure that said notices are not altered, defaced, or covered
by any other material.
(c) Notify the Regional Director for the Twelfth Region, in writ-
ing, within 10 days from the date of this Order, what steps the
Respondent has taken to comply herewith.
2In the event that this Order is enforced by a decree of a United States Court of
Appeals, there shall be substituted for the words "Pursuant to a Decision and Order" the
words "Pursuant to a Decree of the United States Court of Appeals, Enforcing an Order."
APPENDIX
NOTICE TO ALL EMPLOYEES
Pursuant to a Decision and Order of the National Labor Relations
Board, and in order to effectuate the policies of the National Labor
Relations Act, as amended, we hereby notify our employees that:
AVE WILL NOT refuse to bargain collectively with United Trans-
port Service Employees, AFL-CIO, Local 3000, as the exclusive
representative of all employees in the bargaining unit described
below.
WE WILL NOT in any like or related manner interfere with the
efforts of the United Transport Service Employees, AFL-CIO,
Local 3000, to bargain collectively.
WE WILL, upon request, bargain collectively with United Trans-
port Service Employees, AFL-CIO, Local 3000, as the exclusive
bargaining representative of all employees in the bargaining unit
described below with respect to wages, rates of pay, hours of
employment, and other terms and conditions of employment, and
if an understanding is reached, embody such understanding in a
signed agreement.
The bargaining unit is :
All employees at the Employer's Jacksonville, Florida, plant,
including local drivers, mechanics, and seasonal employees who
have already worked 10 weeks and are presently employed, and
those who have a reasonable expectancy of working 10 weeks
during the present season, but excluding all other seasonal em-
ployees, over-the-road drivers, office clericals, salesmen, chem-
ists, laboratory technicians, guards, and all supervisors as de-
UNITED STATES MOLDED SHAPES 357
fined in the Act, constitute a unit appropriate for the purpose
of collective bargaining within the meaning of Section 9(b) of
the Act.
FLORIDA AGRICULTURAL SUPPLY COMPANY,
Employer.
Dated---------------- By-------------------------------------
(Representative ) ( Title)
This notice must remain posted for 60 consecutive days from the
date of posting, and must not be altered, defaced, or covered by any
other material.
Employees may communicate directly with the Board's Regional
Office, Ross Building, 112 East Cass Street, Tampa 2, Florida, Tele-
phone No. 223-4623, if they have any question concerning this notice
or compliance with its provisions.
Kenneth A. Zick, d/b/a United States Molded Shapes and Lodge
980 of the International Association of Machinists , AFL-CIO.
Case No. 7-CA-3640. March 12, 1963
DECISION AND ORDER
On October 1, 1962, Trial Examiner James A. Shaw issued his
Intermediate Report in the above-entitled proceeding, finding that
the Respondent had not engaged in and was not engaging in unfair
labor practices alleged in the complaint and recommending that the
complaint be dismissed in its entirety, as set forth in the attached
Intermediate Report. Thereafter, the General Counsel filed excep-
tions and a brief in support of these exceptions.
Pursuant to the provisions of Section 3 (b) of the Act, the Board
has delegated its powers in connection with this case to a three-
member panel [Members Leedom, Fanning, and Brown].
The Board has reviewed the rulings of the Trial Examiner made at
the hearing and finds that no prejudicial error was committed. The
rulings are hereby affirmed. The Board has considered the Intermedi-
ate Report, the exceptions and brief, and the entire record in this case,
and hereby adopts the findings, conclusions, and recommendations of
the Trial Examiner to the extent consistent with our decision herein.
1. The complaint alleged, and the Respondent's answer admitted,
that the Respondent failed and refused to bargain with the Union
in an appropriate unit.'
The Trial Examiner found, however, that Respondent did not there-
by violate Section 8 (a) (5) and (1) of the Act. We agree with his
1 The appropriateness of the unit is not disputed.
141 NLRB No. 26.