National Weaving Co.

National Labor Relations Board - Board Decisions

Jun 14, 1938

7 N.L.R.B. 916 (N.L.R.B. 1938)

In the Matter of NATIONAL WEAVING COMPANY and TEXTILE WORKERS
ORGANIZING COMMITTEE
Case No. R-713.-Decided June 14, 1938
Textile Industry-Investigation of Representatives : controversy concerning
representation of employees : majority status disputed by employer-Unit Ap-
propriate for Collective Bargaining : hourly and piece-rate production and main-
tenance employees , excluding supervisory and clerical employees and watch-
men ; no controversy as to -Representatives : eligibility to participate in choice :
employees temporarily laid off-Election Ordered
Mr. Herbert 0. Eby, for the Board.
Mr. Emory B. Denny, of Gastonia, N. C., for the Company.
Mr. Seth P. Brewer, of Charlotte, N. C., for the T. W. O. C.
Mr. Roman Beck, of counsel to the Board.
DECISION
AND
DIRECTION OF ELECTION
STATEMENT OF THE CASE
On November 13, 1937, Textile Workers Organizing Committee,
herein called the T. W. O. C., filed with the Regional Director for
the Fifth Region (Baltimore, Maryland) a petition alleging that a
question affecting commerce had arisen concerning the representa-
tion of employees of National Weaving Company, Incorporated,'
Lowell, North Carolina, herein called the Company, and requesting
an investigation and certification of representatives pursuant to Sec-
tion 9 (c) of the National Labor Relations Act, 49 Stat. 449, herein
called the Act. On February 4, 1938, the National Labor Relations
Board, herein called the Board, acting pursuant to Section 9 (c)
of the Act and Article III, Section 3, of National Labor Relations
Board Rules and Regulations-Series 1, as amended, ordered an in-
vestigation and authorized the Regional Director to conduct it and
to provide for an appropriate hearing upon due notice.
On March 11, 1938, the Regional Director issued a notice of hear-
ing, copies of which were duly served upon the Company and upon
I From the papers filed by the Company and its counsel's statements at the hearing,
It appears that its correct name is National Weaving Company, Incorporated.
916
DECISIONS AND ORDERS 917
the T. W. O. C. Pursuant to the notice, a hearing was held on April
25,,1938, at Charlotte, North Carolina, before Webster Powell, the
Trial Examiner duly designated by the Board. The Board and the
Company were represented by counsel; T. W. O. C. was represented
by its Carolinas Administrator; and all participated in the hearing.
Full opportunity to be heard, to examine and cross-examine witnesses,
and to introduce evidence bearing on the issues was afforded all
parties. During the course of the hearing the Trial Examiner made
several rulings on objections to the admission of evidence. The
Board has reviewed the rulings of the Trial Examiner and finds
that no prejudicial errors were committed. The rulings are hereby
affirmed. At the close of the hearing, the Company moved to dis-
miss the proceeding and the Trial Examiner reserved decision on the
motion. We hereby deny the motion.
After the hearing, the Company filed a brief with the Board, which
has received due consideration.
Upon the entire record in the case, the Board makes the following :
FINDINGS OF FACT
I. THE BUSINESS OF THE COMPANY
National Weaving Company, Incorporated, is a North Carolina
corporation engaged in the weaving of rayon and silk dress goods,
linings, and underwear fabrics. The Company's plant is located in
Lowell, North Carolina, and it has a sales office in New York City.
All of the raw materials used in the manufacture of the Company's
products are sent to its Lowell, North Carolina, plant from States
other than North Carolina, and fully 90 per cent of its finished goods
are shipped outside the State. The estimated annual gross business
of the Company was about $4,000,000. The Lowell plant has 913
looms, and on the Friday preceding the hearing, 710 persons were in
the Company's employ.
H. THE ORGANIZATION INVOLVED
Textile Workers Organizing Committee is a labor organization
affiliated with the Committee for Industrial Organization, admitting
to its membership all hourly and piece-rate production and mainte-
nance employees of the Company, excluding supervisory and clerical
employees and watchmen.
III. THE QUESTION CONCERNING REPRESENTATION
In its petition, T. W. O. C. states that 344 employees in the unit
claimed by it to be appropriate have authorized T. W. 0. C. to
918 NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD
represent them for the purposes of collective bargaining. The peti-
tion further states that there were approximately 550 employees in the
bargaining unit deemed by it to be appropriate. The Company
denies that T. W. 0. C. represents a majority of its employees in
such unit. The Company, however, made a motion to dismiss the
proceeding on the ground that prior to the filing of the petition
T. W. 0. C. did not request the Company to bargain with it or to
recognize it as the exclusive representative of the employees in the
unit claimed to be appropriate. The petition is sufficient to confer
jurisdiction to institute this investigation. At the hearings, which
is but one step in the investigation, the T. W. 0. C. introduced evi-
dence that it represented a substantial number of the workers, and
the Company disputed its majority status. We think that these
facts show that there is a question concerning representation which
warrants the continuance of the investigation to determine that
question.
We find that a question has arisen concerning representation of
employees of the Company.
IV. TIIE EFFECT OF THE QUESTION CONCERNING REPRESENTATION UPON
COMMERCE
We find that the question concerning representation which has
arisen, occurring in connection with the operations of the Company
described in Section I above, has a close, intimate, and substantial
relation to trade, traffic, and commerce among the several States, and
tends to lead to labor disputes burdening and obstructing commerce
and the free flow of commerce.
V. THE APPROPRIATE UNIT
The Company and T. W. 0. C. agreed that the appropriate unit
for purposes of collective bargaining should comprise all hourly and
piece-rate production and maintenance employees of the Company
at its Lowell plant, excluding supervisory and clerical employees and
watchmen. We see no reason to deviate from the unit agreed upon
by the parties.
We find that the hourly and piece-rate production and maintenance
employees of the Company at its Lowell, North Carolina, plant, ex-
cluding supervisory and clerical employees and watchmen, constitute
a unit appropriate for the purposes of collective bargaining and that
said unit will insure to employees of the Company the full benefit
of their right to self-organization and to collective bargaining and
otherwise effectuate the policies of the Act.
DECISIONS AND ORDERS
VI. THE DETERMINATION OF REPRESENTATIVES
919
The petition states that T. W. O. C. represented 344 employees of
about 550 workers in the appropriate unit. Almost 6 months elapsed
between the filing of the petition and the hearing, and the number
of employees in the appropriate unit increased to more than 700 at
the time of the hearing. Moreover, the evidence discloses that the
labor turn-over of the Company during the period of the pendency
of this proceeding was very high. Under these circumstances, we
find that the question which has arisen concerning representation can
best be resolved by the holding of an election by secret ballot.
T. W. O. C. suggested that the persons employed on November 12,
1937, the date of the filing of the petition, be eligible to vote. In
view of the substantial increase since that date in the number of em-
ployees in the appropriate unit and the high labor turn-over, we
think that a later date is preferable. Accordingly, those eligible to
vote in the election shall be the persons in the appropriate unit em-
ployed by the Company at its Lowell, North Carolina, plant on April
,25, 1938, the date of the hearing, excluding those who have since quit,
or have since been discharged for cause, but including those who have
since been only temporarily laid off.
Upon the basis of the above findings of fact and upon the entire
record in the case, the Board makes the following :
CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
1. A question affecting commerce has arisen concerning employees
of National Weaving Company, Incorporated, Lowell, North Caro-
lina, within the meaning of Section 9 (c) and Section 2 (6) and (7),
.of the National Labor Relations -Act.
2. All hourly and piece-rate production and maintenance em-
ployees of the Company, excluding supervisory and clerical employees
and watchmen, constitute a unit appropriate for the purposes of
collective bargaining, within the meaning of Section 9 (b) of the
National Labor Relations Act.
DIRECTION OF ELECTION
By virtue of and pursuant to the power vested in the National
Labor Relations Board by Section 9 (c) of the National Labor Rela-
tions Act, and pursuant to Article III, Section 8, of National Labor
Relations Board Rules and Regulations-Series 1, as amended, it
is hereby
DIRECTED that, as part of the investigation ordered by the Board to
ascertain representatives for the purpose of collective bargaining
106791-38-vol. vii-59
920 NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD
with National Weaving Company, Incorporated, Lowell, North Caro-
lina, an election by secret ballot shall be conducted within twenty (20)
days from the date of this Direction under the direction and super-
yision of the Regional Director for the Fifth Region, acting in this
matter as agent for the National Labor Relations Board and subject
to Article III, Section 9, of said Rules and Regulations, among all
hourly and piece-rate production and maintenance employees at the
Lowell, North Carolina, plant of the Company, who were employed
by it on April 25, 1938, excluding supervisory and clerical employees,
watchmen, and those who have since quit, or have been discharged
for cause, but including those who have since been only temporarily
laid off, to determine whether or not they desire to be represented by
Textile Workers Organizing Committee, affiliated with the Com-
mittee for Industrial Organization, for the purposes of collective
bargaining.