National Tea Co.

National Labor Relations Board - Board Decisions

Oct 12, 1938

9 N.L.R.B. 161 (N.L.R.B. 1938)

'In the Matter of NATIONAL T EA COMPANY and UNITED GROCERY
WORKERS UNION, CHICAGO LOCAL
Case No. C-713.-Decided October 10, 1938
Retail Uiocery Industry-Settlement: stipulation providing for cessation of
.unfair labor practices, suspension of closed-shop contract, and taking of certain
affirmative action, including reinstatement of, employ-ees with back pay and
disestablishment of company-dominated organization-Order: entered on stipu-
lation-D2sci imination: charges of, dismissed without prejudice as to one person.
Mr. I. S. Dorfman, Mr. Jack Evans, and Mr. Stephen Reynolds,
for the Board.
Kirkland, Fleming, Green, Martin cC Ellis, of Chicago, Ill., and
Mr. F. H. Massmann, of Chicago, Ill., for the respondent.
Mr. Francis Heisler, and Mr. M. W. Buller, both of-Chicago, Ill.,
for the Union.
Mr. Bernard W. Freund, of counsel to-the Board.
DECISION
AND
ORDER
STATEMENT OF THE CASE
Upon charges filed on May 26, 1937, and amended on July 8,
1937, on May 21, 1938 , and on June 2, 1938, by United Grocery
Workers Union, Chicago Local , affiliated with the Committee for
Industrial Organization , herein called the Union,' the National Labor
Relations Board, herein called the Board, by Leonard C. Bajork,
-Regional Director for the Thirteenth Region (Chicago, Illinois),
issued its complaint dated June 2, , 1938, - with accompanying notice
of a hearing thereon to be held on June 9, 1938 , against National
Tea Company , Chicago, Illinois, herein called the respondent , alleg-
ing that the respondent in the operation of its plant in Chicago,
Illinois, had engaged in and was engaging in unfair , labor , practices
-affecting commerce within the meaning of Section 8 ( 1,), (2), and
(3) and Section 2 (6) and ( 7) of the National Labor Relations Act,
49 Stat. 449, herein called the Act. -
'In its original charge the Union was incorrectly designated as "United warehouse
workers Union." The words "Chicago Local, affiliated with the Committee for Industrial
Organization " do not appear . in the original charge or in the first amended charge.
9NL.RB,.No25.
161
162 NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD
The complaint alleged, in substance, (1) that the respondent dis-
charged Joseph E. Siko, Israel Rappaport, Mike Smith, Julius M.
Koziol, Walter Bratek, Edmund Jezierski, Casmir Kula, Harry Jar-
vis, and Alexander Kuczek on specified dates between April 6 and 28,
1937, inclusive, and thereafter refused to employ or reinstate them,
because they had joined and assisted the Union and engaged in con-
certed activities for the purposes of collective bargaining and other
mutual aid and protection; (2) that the respondent dominated and
interfered with Nateco Employees Cooperative Association during the
period March 1-May 3, 1937; (3) that on and after March 1, 1937,
the respondent, by its officers, agents and employees, advised, urged,
and warned its employees to refrain from joining or retaining mem-
bership in the Union; (4) that the aforesaid acts of the respondent
caused its employees to strike on April 29, 1937, and to continue to
strike until August 17, 1937; (5) that on August 17, 1937, 138 named
employees who participated in the strike applied for employment in
the respondent's plant, and that the respondent then and at all times
thereafter refused and failed to employ them for the reason that they
had joined and assisted the Union and engaged in concerted activitie8
for the purposes of collective bargaining and other mutual aid and
protection; (6) that the respondent discharged Frank Kubeck on
November 2, 1937, and thereafter refused or failed to employ him,
because he had joined and assisted the Union and refused to join
Wholesale Grocery Supplies Union, No. 20658, herein called Local
No. 20658; (7) that on and after May 3, 1937, the respondent, by its
officers and agents, advised, urged, and warned its employees to join
and assist Local No. 20658; (8) that on May 3, 1937, the respondent
entered into a written agreement with Local No. 20658, in which it
agreed to enter into a further written agreement covering wages,
hours, and working conditions of respondent's employees in the event
that a majority of respondent's employees joined Local No. 20658;
(9) that on July 29, 1937, the respondent in fact entered into such a
further written agreement with Local No. 20658, by which the respon-
dent agreed in part, in Article I (a) thereof, (a) that it would inform
all applicants for employment that all of the employees in the ware-
house and manufacturing departments are members of Local No.
20658 and that the applicant must take membership in Local No.
20658 into consideration in applying for employment, and (b) that
it would supply to the secretary of Local No. 20658 the names of all
employees engaged for work in any of the respective departments;
(10) that after the expiration of-said further written agreement, on
April 1, 1938, the respondent and Local No. 20658 renewed said agree-
ment with minor changes; and (11) that, by all of the aforesaid acts,
the respondent interfered with, restrained, and coerced its employees
in the exercise of the rights guaranteed in Section 7 of the Act.
DECISIONS A\D 011DERS 163
On June 2, 1938, the respondent and the Union filed waivers of notice
of hearing and service of the complaint, for the stated purpose of
"continuing settlement negotiations prior to the service of said com-
plaint." On June 8, 1938, the Regional Director issued an order post-
poning the hearing of the case from June 9 to June 16, 1938. On the
same date, the respondent, the Union, and Local No. 20658, jointly,
filed an additional waiver of notice of hearing and service of the
complaint. On June 23, 1938, the respondent, the Union, and counsel
for the Board entered into a stipulation and agreement for the pur-
pose of settling the case, subject to approval by the Board. The
stipulation and agreement was received for approval by the Board in
Washington on June 24, 1938. On June 27, 1938, the Board issued an
order approving the said stipulation and making it a part of the
record in the case, and further ordered, in accordance with Article II,
Section 37, of National Labor Relations Board Rules and Regula-
tions-Series L as amended, that the proceeding be transferred to the
Board and continued before it. On September 30, 1937, a supple-
mental stipulation and agreement was entered into between the re-
spondent, the Union, and counsel for the Board. The supplemental
stipulation is hereby approved and made a part of the record in the
case:
The above-mentioned stipulation and agreement reads as follows:
It is hereby stipulated and agreed by and between the National
Tea Co., hereinafter called respondent; the United Grocery Work-
ers Union, Chicago Local, hereinafter called the union; and I. S.
Dorfman, Jack Evans and Stephen Reynolds, attorneys, National
Labor Relations Board; that
1. Upon charges duly filed by the union, through H. W. Buller,
its Secretary, the National Labor Relations Board, herein called
the Board, by Leonard C. Bajork, Regional Director for the
Thirteenth Region, issued a complaint and a notice of hearing
dated June 2, 1938, against National Tea Co., alleging that re-
spondent had engaged in and is engaging in, unfair labor prac-
tices affecting commerce, within the meaning of Section 8, Sub-
divisions (1), (2), and (3), and Section 2, Subdivisions (6) and
(7) of the National Labor Relations Act, 49 Stat. 449, herein
called the Act. The hearing was set for June 9, 1938 before a
Trial Examiner duly authorized by the Board. On June 2, 1938,
the parties executed a waiver of notice of hearing and of service
of complaint. On June 8,1938 respondent, the union, and Whole-
sale Groceries Supplies Union Number 20658, a labor organiza-
tion, executed a further waiver of Notice of Hearing and of
Service of Complaint. On June 8, 1938 the said Regional Direc-
134008-3°-vol. ix-12
164 N,11 IO\AL LABOR 1{L'LATIONS BOARD
tor, upon request of respondent and Wholesale. Groceries Supplies
Union Number 20658, and in accordance with the National Labor
Relations Board Rules and Regulations, Series 1, as Amended,
continued the date of hearing to June 16, 1938.
2. Respondent is a corporation organized under and existing
by virtue of the laws of the State of Illinois, having its principal
office at 1000 Crosby Street, in the City of Chicago, County of
Cook, State of Illinois, and branch offices at 2837-3rd Avenue,
South, Minneapolis, Minnesota, and 324 Jackson Street, Mil-
waukee, Wisconsin.
3. Respondent operates a chain of approximately 1205 retail
grocery stores which are distributed throughout 8 States of the
United States, approximately as follows: Illinois-844; Indi-
ana-15; Iowa-74; Michigan-8; Minnesota-121; North Da-
kota-13; South 'Dakota-10 ; and Wisconsin-125. The stores
in Minnesota are operated through a subsidiary corporation
incorporated under the laws of the State of Delaware. The
-stores in Michigan are operated through a subsidiary corpora-
tion incorporated under the laws of the State of Michigan, and
the stores in Wisconsin are operated through a subsidiary corpo-
ration incorporated under the laws of the State of Wisconsin.
All the other stores are operated by the parent corporation,
respondent herein.
4. Respondent is now, and has been at all times hereinafter
mentioned, engaged, at a place of business in Chicago, Illinois,
hereinafter called the plant, in the warehousing, storing, packing,
repacking and distributing of foods and grocery products, and
in the preparing of many food products by baking, preserving,
canning, bottling, pickling, and other processes. The plant is the
principal point of distribution for other warehouses and retail
stores owned and operated by respondent.
5. Respondent, in the course and conduct of its business and
in the operation of its plant, causes and has continuously caused
approximately sixty-five per cent (65%) of the foodstuffs and
grocery products of all kinds stored, packed, and/or processed at
the plant to be purchased and transported in interstate com-
merce from and through States of the United States other than
the State of Illinois, and from foreign countries, to the plant in
the State of Illinois, and causes and has continuously caused
approximately ten per cent (10%) of the foodstuffs and grocery
products of all kinds stored, packed, processed, and produced at
the plant to be sold and transported in interstate commerce from
the -plant in the State of Illinois to respondent's warehouses and
retail stores located in States of the United States other than
the State of Illinois. Respondent's gross sates for the fiscal year
DECISIONS AND ORDERS 165
ending December 31, 1937, were approximately Sixty-two Mil-
lion, One Hundred Thousand Dollars ($62,100,000.00)-
6. The union is a labor organization within the meaning of
-Section 2 (5) of the Act.
7. Respondent will cease and desist from :
- (a) In any manner interfering with, restraining or coercing
its employees in, the exercise of,their rights to self-organization,
to form, join and assist labor organizations, to bargain col-
lectively through representatives of their own choosing, and
to engage in concerted activities for the purpose of collective
bargaining and other mutual aid or protection, as guaranteed
in Section 7 of the Act ;
(b) Discouraging membership in the United Grocery Workers
Union, Chicago Local, or any other labor organization of its
employees, by discriminating against its employees in, regard
to hire or tenure of employment or any term or condition of
employment;
(c) In any manner dominating or interfering with the for-
mation or administration of Nateco Employees Cooperative
Association, or any other labor organization of its employees,
or contributing financial or other support to the Nateco Em-
ployees Cooperative Association or to any labor organization.;
(d) Urging, persuading, warning or coercing its employees
to join Wholesale Groceries Supplies Union Number 20658, or
-any other labor organization of its employees, or threatening
-them with discharge if they fail to join any such labor
organization ;
(e) Entering into or giving effect to any "closed shop" or
-"preferential shop" agreement with the said Union or with the
said Wholesale Grocery Supplies Union Number 20658 for a
period of four months from the date of the order of the Board,
hereinafter provided for, and more particularly giving effect
for such period to Article .I, Section a, paragraph 2 of a con-
tract between respondent and said Wholesale Grocery Supplies
Union Number 20658, dated April 2, 1938.
8. Respondent will take the following affirmative action to
,effectuate the policies of the Act :
(a) Offer to each of the employees named in Appendix "A" 2
attached hereto and made a part hereof, full reinstatement to
their former positions or to positions substantially equivalent
thereto, without prejudice to their seniority or other rights and
privileges, dismissing if necessary to provide employment for
2 Set forth in appendix "A" of the Board's Order below The complaint will be dis-
missed without prejudice as to John Comer, who is named in the complaint but is not
covered by the terms of the stipulation and agreement
166 NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD
those to be reinstated persons hired at the plant since April 29,
1937; providing, that respondent shall offer to reinstate said
employees named in Appendix "A" over a period of six (6)
weeks from the date hereof, offering reinstatement to thirty-
nine (39) the first week and not fewer than 24 each week there-
after until all have been offered reinstatement; and providing
further that the union and the Regional Director or his agent
shall designate the order of reinstatement. Employees so dis-
missed and displaced to provide employment for those listed in
Appendix "A", as herein provided, shall constitute a prefer-
ential list to be offered re-employment in preference to any
other employes, ex-employes, or other persons after reinstate-
ment of those listed in Appendix "A".
(b) Make whole the employees set forth in Appendix "A"
hereof, and each of them, for any loss of pay,they have suf-
fered by reason of their discharges, by payment to said em-
ployees upon approval of this stipulation, on direction of the
Board, the sum of fifty-one thousand dollars ($51,000.00) in
full and complete satisfaction of all liabilities of respondent
for back pay on account of the matters and things set forth in
the Complaint, as follows :
(1) Immediately upon the approval of this stipulation, on
direction of the Board, pay to Joseph E. Siko, Israel Rappa-
port, Mike Smith, Julius M. Koziel, Casimir T. Kula, Alex
S. Kuczek, Harry Jarvis, Edmund Jezierski and Walter
Bratek, and each of them, the sums determined by the Re-
gional Director or his agent, which each of said persons
would normally have earned as wages during the period
from the date of discharge to April 28, 1937 less the amount
earned by each during such period, not considering as earn-
ings wages received by each as employes of Works Progress
Administration.
(2) Immediately upon approval of this stipulation, on
direction of the Board, pay to the employes set forth in
Appendix "A" (including Joseph E. Siko, Israel Rappa-
port, Mike Smith, Julius M. Koziel, Casimir T. Kula, Alex
S. Kuczek, Harry Jarvis, Edmund Jezierski and Walter
Bratek) the sum of thirty-one thousand dollars ($31,000.00)
minus the aggregate paid out under sub-paragraph (1)
hereof, each employe set forth in Appendix "A" to receive
a proportionate share of said sum, based upon a sum equal
to that which he would normally have, earned as wages for
the period from August 17, 1937, to the date of this stipu-
lation, less the amount earned by him during such period
(wages received as employees of the Works Progress Ad-
DECISIONS AND ORDERS 167
ministration not to be deducted as earnings) ; provided that
the standard for determining wages which each of said
employees would normally have earned during the period
from August 17, 1937 to the date of this stipulation shall
be the average sum earned as wages by each of said em-
ployees during the period of four weeks prior to April
28, 1937; and provided further that in the case of Frank
E. Lubeck said standard shall be' the sum he earned as
wages during the period from August 24 to November 2,
1937.
(3) Pay to said employees set forth in Appendix "A"
hereof, a further sum totalling Twenty Thousand Dollars
($20,000.00) in six equal installments upon July 16, August
16, September 16, October 15, November 16 and December
16, 1938, said sum to be allocated among each of said em-
ployees in the same manner as provided for in paragraph
8 subparagraph (2) herein.
(c) Withdraw all recognition from the Nateco Employees
Cooperative Association as a representative of its employees
at the plant for the purpose of dealing with respondent con-
cerning grievances, labor disputes, wages, rates of pay, hours
of employment, or conditions of work; and completely dis-
establish said Nateco Employees Cooperative Association as
such representative.
(d) Post and keep visible in conspicuous places throughout
the plant for a period of thirty (30) days after receipt, copies
of the order to be entered by the National Labor Relations
Board herein.
9. This stipulation and agreement is made subject to approval
by the Board. In the event that this stipulation and agreement
shall not be and become effective all waivers in this paragraph
contained shall not be effective or binding upon the parties and
the execution and signing of this stipulation and agreement by
the parties shall not constitute admission of any fact or thing
by either of the parties. The union and the respondent each
waive their right to hearing as set forth in Section 10 (b) and
(c) of the Act, and agree that this stipulation and agreement
and the third amended charge, Complaint, and waivers of no-
tice may be introduced as evidence by filing them with the
Chief Trial Examiner of the Board in Washington, D. C. Upon
this stipulation, if approved by the Board, an order may forth-
with be entered by the Board as set forth in paragraphs 7 and
8, herein. Respondent and the union consent to the entry by
the appropriate Circuit Court of Appeals of an enforcement
order embodying the terms of the Board order.
168 NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD
By the above-mentioned supplemental stipulation and agreement.
it was provided that the following words in paragraph 7 (e) of the-
original stipulation be stricken : " . . . from the date of the order
of the Board, hereinafter provided for," and the following sub-
stituted : " . . . from June 23, 1938."
On the basis of the above stipulations and agreements and upon the
entire record in the case, the Board makes the following:
FINDINGS OF FACT
1. THE BUSINESS OF THE RESPONDENT
. The respondent, an Illinois corporation with its principal office at
Chicago, Illinois, is engaged in the retail grocery business. It
operates a chain of approximately 1,205 retail grocery stores, of which
approximately 844 are located in Illinois, 15 in Indiana, 74 in Iowa,
8 in Michigan, 121 in Minnesota, 13, in North Dakota, 10 in South
Dakota, and 125 in Wisconsin. The stores in Minnesota, Michigan,
and Wisconsin are operated through subsidiary corporations.
The respondent operates a place of business at Chicago, Illinois,.
herein called the plant, with which the present proceedings are con-
cerned, at which it is engaged in the warehousing, storing, packing,
repacking, and distributing of foods and grocery products, and in
the preparing of many food products by baking, preserving, canning,
bottling, pickling, and other processes. The plant is the principal
point of distribution for other warehouses and retail stores owned,
and operated by the respondent.
In the course and conduct of its business and in the operation of"
its plant at Chicago, Illinois, the respondent causes and has con-
tinuously caused approximately 65 per cent of the foodstuffs and
grocery products of all kinds stored, packed, or processed at the
plant to be purchased and transported to the plant from and through.
States other than Illinois, and from foreign countries, and causes
and has continuously caused approximately 10 per cent of the food-
stuffs and grocery products of all kinds stored, packed, processed,
and produced at the plant to be sold and transported from the plant
to the respondent's warehouses and retail stores located in States.
other than Illinois. The respondent's gross sales for the fiscal year
ending December 31, 1937, were approximately $62,100,000.
We find that the above-described operations of the respondent
constitute a continuous flow of trade, traffic, and commerce among the
several States.
ORDER
On the basis of the above stipulations and agreements and findings
of fact, and upon the entire record in the case, and pursuant to
Section 10 (c) of the National Labor Relations Act, the National
DECISIONS AND ORDERS 169
Labor Relations Board hereby orders that the respondent, National
Tea Co., Chicago, Illinois, its officers, agents, successors, and assigns
shall :
1. Cease and desist from :
(a) In any manner interfering with, restraining, or coercing its
employees in the exercise of their rights to self-organization to form,
join, and assist labor organizations, to bargain collectively through
representatives of their own choosing, and to engage in concerted
activities for the purpose of collective bargaining and other mutual
aid or protection, as guaranteed in Section 7 of the Act;
(b) Discouraging membership in the United Grocery Workers
Union, Chicago Local, or any other labor organization of its em-
ployees, by discriminating against its employees in regard to hire or
tenure of employment or any term or condition of employment;
(c) In any manner dominating or interfering with the formation
or administration of Nateco Employees Cooperative Association, or
any other labor organization of its employees, or contributing finan-
cial or other support to the Nateco Employees Cooperative Associa-
tion or to any labor organization;
(d) Urging, persuading, warning, or coercing its employees to
join Wholesale Grocery Supplies Union, No. 20658, or any other
labor organization of its employees, or threatening them with dis-
charge if they fail to join any such labor organization;
(e) Entering into or giving effect to any "closed shop" or "prefer-
ential shop" agreement with the said Union or with the said Whole-
sale Grocery Supplies Union, No. 20658, for a period of 4 months
from June 23, 1938, and, more particularly, giving effect for such
period to Article I; Section (a), paragraph 2, of a contract between
respondent and said Wholesale Grocery Supplies Union, No. 20658,
dated April 2, 1938.
2. Take the following affirmative action which the Board finds will
effectuate the policies of the Act :
(a) Offer to each of the employees named in appendix "A" at-
tached hereto and made a part hereof, full reinstatement to their
former positions or to positions substantially equivalent thereto, with-
out prejudice to their seniority or other rights and privileges, dis-
missing if necessary to provide employment for those to be rein-
stated persons hired at the plant since April 29, 1937; providing, that
respondent shall offer to reinstate said employees named in appendix
"A" over a period of 6 weeks from June 23, 1938, offering reinstate-
ment to 39 the first week and not fewer than 24 each week thereafter
until all have been offered reinstatement; and providing further that
the Union and the Regional Director or his agent shall designate the
order of reinstatement. Employees so dismissed and displaced to
provide employment for those listed in appendix "A", as herein
170 NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD
provided, shall constitute a preferential list to be offered reemploy-
ment in preference to any other employees, ex-employees, or other
persons after reinstatement of those listed in appendix "A";
(b) Make whole the employees set forth in appendix "A" hereof,
and each of them, for any loss of pay they have suffered by reason
of their discharges, by payment to said employees of the sum of
fifty-one thousand dollars ($51,000.00) in full and complete satisfac-
tion of all liabilities of respondent for back pay on account of the
-matters and things set forth in the complaint, as follows :
(1) Immediately pay to Joseph E. Siko, Israel Rappaport, Mike
`Smith, Julius M. Koziel, Casimir T. Kula, Alex S. Kuczek, Harry
Jarvis, Edmund Jezierski; and Walter Bratek, and each of them,
the sums determined by the Regional Director or his agent, which
,each of said persons would normally have earned as wages during
the period from the date of discharge to April 28, 1937, less the
amount earned by each during such period, not considering as earn-
ings wages received by each as employees of Works Progress
Administration ;
(2) Immediately pay to the employees set -forth.in, appendix "A"
(including Joseph E. Siko, Israel Rappaport, Mike Smith, Julius M.
Koziel, Casimir T. Kula, Alex S. Kuczek, Harry Jarvis, Edmund
-Jezierski, and Walter Bratek) the sum of thirty-one thousand. dol-
lars ($31,000.00) minus the aggregate paid out under subparagraph
(1) hereof, each employee set forth in appendix "A" to receive a
proportionate share of said sum, based upon a sum equal to that
which he would normally have earned as wages for the period from
August 17, 1937, to June 23, 1938, less the amount earned by him
-during such period (wages received as employees of the Works
Progress Administration not to be deducted as earnings) ; provided
that the standard for determining wages which each of said em-
ployees would normally have earned during the period from August
17, 1937, to June 23, 1938, shall be the average sum earned as wages
by each of said employees during the period of 4 weeks prior to
April 28, 1937; and provided further that in the case of Frank E.
Kubeck said standard shall be the sum he earned as wages during
-the period from August 24 to November 2, 1937;
(3) Pay to said employees set forth in appendix "A" hereof, a
-further sum totaling twenty thousand dollars ($20,000.00) in six equal
installments on July 16, August 16, September 16, October 15, No-
vember 16, and December 16, 1938, said sum to be allocated among
each of said employees in the same manner as provided for in the
preceding paragraph;
(c) Withdraw all recognition from the Nateco Employees Coop-
erative Association as a representative of its employees at the plant
DECISIONS AND ORDERS 171
for the purpose of dealing with respondent concerning grievances,
labor disputes, wages, rates of pay, hours of employment, or condi-
tions of work; and completely disestablish said Nateco Employees
Cooperative Association as such representative ;
(d) Post and keep visible in conspicuous places throughout the
plant for a' period of thirty (30) days after receipt copies of this
Order.
It is further ordered that the complaint be, and it hereby is, dis-
missed without prejudice in so far as it alleges that the respondent
discriminated in regard to the hire, tenure of employment, or other
term or condition of employment of John Comer.
MR. EDWIN S. SnuTii took no part in the consideration of the
above Decision and Order.
APPENDIX "A"
Edward Actor
Victoria Aleksy
Peter Anderson
Karl Appel
Lottie Bator
Carl Benson
John E. Bien
Steven Boor, Jr.
Alfred Borowsky
James Bostick, Jr.
Walter Bratek
Patrick Brogan
Anton Brongel
Steve Bruder
Herman Buller
Herman T. Burandt
Bishop Burt
Cy Carcagno
John M. Castner
Bernard Chall
John M. Collins
Michael Czerniak
1Vilfred G. Colby
Scott Davis
John Desecki
Michael Dobrino
Patrick Doherty
Albert Dulinski
Geo. H. Duncan
Marion Dziekonski
John Dzierzanowski
Alfred Eastman
James Ehrhardt
Mike Federowicz
Lena Ferrara
Betty Fisco
Esther Freiboth
Richard Fugiel
Josephine Fulgenizi
Alex Glass
Alexander Godlewski
Benjamin H. Golden
Arthur Golz
Jos. Gralinski
Verna Grys
Nora Haglund
Hilmar Hansen
Karla Hansen
Timothy Hastings
Walter Hautamaki
Allen Hepner
John Herskind
Orma Howard
Anna K. Ingersoll
Leona Janszyn
Harry Jarvis
E. W. Jefferson
Edmund Jezierski
Erik G. Johnson '
Joseph Kaczmarek
172 NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD
Leroy Kalish
Paul E. Kamin, Jr.
Helen Kendziera
Anna Kober
Kurt Koehler
Helen Kopka
Val Kosky
Louise Kotor
Anthony Kovacevich
Pete Kovacevich
John J. Kozak
Julius Koziol
Edmond Kraft
Frank Kubeck
Alexander S. Kuczek
Helen Kubeck
Chester Kuharski
Casimir T. Kula
Joseph T. Lahendro
John Larkin
Eskild Laursen
Crissie Lawson
Peter Lazaro
August Lehrmann
Naida M. Leonchick
Stanley Macuda
Frank B. Mahon
Frank Masching
Katherine Masterson
Lawrence A. Michaels
Joseph Mohr
Joseph Nagy
Frank Nichols
Mary Nickolis
Bertha Noga
Patrick O'Brien
Walter W. O'Connell
Joseph Oser
Eleanor Paluch
Virginia B. Paluch
Christina Al. S. Pamper
Clifford Perkins
Kurt Peters
Walter Pietrzak
Erich Plath
Carl Pollner
Elmer G. Rank
Israel Rappaport
Herman Roediger
Gertrude Romano
Herman A. Ruckteschler
Thomas Ruth
Rudolph Ruzek
John Saari
Richard Snadmann
Leonard Schneider
William Schulte
Sam Serritella
Julius Sifferling
Joseph Siko
Mike Smith
Albert Smola
Lawrence Sollman
Peter Son
Virginia Sowiak
Martin J. Steger, Jr.
Albert Stanicz
Tony Strmiska
Wanda Szczpanik
Leo Szwiec .
M. Roskoske
Mary Terlecki
Johanna Thomas
Jens R. Thompsen
Lawrence Troglia
Helen. Trybula
Vincent Victor
Eugene Vlasak
Eleanor Von Drasek
James E. Vonesh
George Waddell, Sr.
Eugene Wagner
Joseph Wetzler
Martha P. Wieder
Henry Wiegel
Leo Wowczuk
Joseph Wukitchs
Henry Yeager
Helen Zemancik