LAZARUS ENERGY HOLDINGS LLCDownload PDFNational Labor Relations Board - Unpublished Board DecisionsNov 24, 202016-RC-266439 (N.L.R.B. Nov. 24, 2020) Copy Citation UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BEFORE THE NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD LAZARUS ENERGY HOLDINGS, LLC Employer and Case 16-RC-266439 UNITED STEEL, PAPER AND FORESTRY, RUBBER, MANUFACTURING, ENERGY, ALLIED INDUSTRIAL AND SERVICE WORKERS INTERNATIONAL UNION AFL-CIO Petitioner ORDER The Employer’s Request for Review of the Regional Director’s Decision and Direction of Election is denied as it raises no substantial issues warranting review.1 On November 9, 2020, the Board issued its decision in Aspirus Keweenaw, 370 NLRB No. 45 (2020), which sets forth the guidelines and parameters applicable to determining the propriety of a mail-ballot election under the current circumstances of the Covid-19 pandemic. In denying review, we note that the direction of a mail-ballot election was consistent with the concerns articulated in Aspirus Keweenaw. Moreover, the election has been held and setting it aside would result in waste of resources and delay and would be a disservice to the employees who cast their ballots in good faith. Denying review is also warranted because the current trend in new cases in the county where the Employer’s facility is located would support a mail-ballot election under Aspirus Keweenaw if this election were set aside and a new determination were to be made now.2 Under all of the foregoing circumstances, we find no reason to overturn the Regional Director’s determination. JOHN F. RING, CHAIRMAN 1 We also deny the Employer’s Emergency Motion to Stay Mail Ballot Election as moot. 2 As of the date of this Order, the 14-day trend in the number of new cases in Bexar County, Texas is increasing. https://covid19.sanantonio.gov/About-COVID-19/Dashboards- Data/Bexar-County-Key-Indicators. Additionally, the 14-day testing positivity in Bexar County has remained at a sustained rate of over 8.0%. See id. Member McFerran agrees to deny review of the Regional Director’s Decision and Direction of Election for the reasons given in her separate opinion in Aspirus. She further agrees, however, that setting aside the election at this point would be inefficient and unfair to the unit employees, and that, even under the majority opinion in Aspirus, the Regional Director’s decision should be affirmed based on the recent statistics set out above. WILLIAM J. EMANUEL, MEMBER LAUREN McFERRAN, MEMBER Dated, Washington, D.C., November 24, 2020. Copy with citationCopy as parenthetical citation