Hamrick Mills

National Labor Relations Board - Board DecisionsMay 25, 1938

7 N.L.R.B. 459 (N.L.R.B. 1938)

In the Matter Of HAMRICK MILLS and TEXTILE WORKERS ORGANIZING COMMITTEE Case No. R-706.-Decided May 5, 1938 Cotton Textile Industry-Investigation of Representatives: controversy con- cerning representation of employees : majority status disputed by employer ; employer's refusal to grant recognition of union-Unit Appropriate for Collective Bargaining: production and maintenance employees, excluding clerical and supervisory employees ; stipulation as to-Election Ordered Mr. Marion A. Prowell, for the Board. Mr. G. TV. Speer, of Gaffney, S. C., for the Company. Mr. Cloyd L. Gibson, of Spartanburg, S. C., for the Union. Mr. Aaron Lewittes, of counsel to the Board. DECISION AND DIRECTION OF ELECTION STATEMENT OF THE CASE On November 19, 1937, Textile Workers Organizing Committee, herein called the Union, filed with the Regional Director for the Tenth Region (Atlanta, Georgia) a petition alleging that a question affecting commerce had arisen concerning the representation of em- ployees of Hamrick Mills, Gaffney, South Carolina, herein called the Company, and requesting an investigation and certification of representatives pursuant to Section 9 (c) of the National Labor Relations Act, 49 Stat. 449, herein called the Act. On January 24, 1938, the National Labor Relations Board, herein called the Board, acting pursuant to Section 9 (c) of the Act and Article III, Section 3, of National Labor Relations Board Rules and Regulations-Series 1, as amended, ordered an investigation and authorized the Regional Director to conduct it and to provide for an appropriate hearing upon due notice. On March 24, 1938, the Regional Director issued a notice of hear- ing, copies of which were duly served upon the Company, and upon the Union. Pursuant to the notice, a hearing was held on April 8, 1938, at Spartanburg, South Carolina, before D. Lacy McBryde, 459 460 NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD the Trial Examiner duly designated by the Board. The Board, the Company, and the Union, were represented by counsel and partici- pated in the hearing. Full opportunity to be heard, to examine and cross-examine witnesses, and to introduce evidence bearing on the issues was afforded all parties. No objections to the admission of any evidence were made at the hearing. Upon the entire record in the case, the Board makes the following: FINDINGS OF FACT I. THE BUSINESS OF THE COMPANY Hamrick Mills is a South Carolina corporation engaged in the manufacture of print cloths in Gaffney, South Carolina. The Com- pany employs approximately 294 persons engaged in production, maintenance, supervision, and clerical work. The Company stipu- lated that approximately 35 per cent of the raw materials for its plant are purchased outside the State of South Carolina, and that approximately 25 per cent of the manufactured product is shipped directly to States other than South Carolina. The Company further stipulated that the other 75 per cent of the manufactured product is delivered to a finishing plant at'Lyman, South Carolina, and finally shipped outside the -State. H. THE ORGANIZATION INVOLVED Textile Workers Organizing Committee is a labor organization affiliated with the Committee for Industrial Organization. HI. THE QUESTION CONCERNING REPRESENTATION The Union claims to represent a majority of the employees in an appropriate unit. This the Company denies. We find that a question has arisen concerning representation of employees of the Company. IV. THE -EFFECT OF THE QUESTION CONCERNING REPRESENTATION UPON COMMERCE - We find that the question concerning representation which has arisen, occurring in connection with the operations of the Company described in Section I above, has a close, intimate, and substantial relation to trade, traffic, and commerce among the several States, and tends to lead to labor disputes burdening and obstructing commerce and the free flow of commerce. DECISIONS AND ORDERS V. THE APPROPRIATE UNIT 461 The Company and the Union agreed that the production and main- tenance employees, excluding clerical and supervisory employees, should constitute the, appropriate unit. We see no reason to alter the agreeduunit. We find that the production and maintenance employees of the Company, ,excluding clerical and. supervisory em- ployees, constitute a unit appropriate for the purposes of collective bargaining and that said unit will insure to employees of the Com- pany the full benefit of their right to self-organization and to, collective bargaining and otherwise effectuate the policies of the Act. VI. THE 'DETERMINATION OF REPRESENTATIVES The Company and the Union stipulated that if C. L. Gibson, an organizer for the Union, were called to the stand he would testify that approximately 68 per cent, or 204 employees of the Company, were members of the Union. There was no other evidence to show that the Union had a majority. Accordingly, we shall order an election. The Company and the Union agree,. and we conclude, that the employees whose names appear on the pay roll for the week ending March 5, 1938, shall be eligible to vote, excluding those who have since quit or been discharged for cause. Upon the basis of the above findings of fact and upon the entire record in the case, the Board makes the following : CONCLUSIONS OF LAW 1. A question affecting commerce has arisen concerning the repre- sentation of employees of Hamrick Mills, Gaffney, South Carolina,, within the meaning of Section 9 (c) and Section 2 (6) and (7), of the National Labor Relations Act. 2. The production and, maintenance employees of the Company,, excluding clerical and supervisory employees, constitute a unit appro- priate for the purposes of collective bargaining within the meaning of Section 9 (b) of the National Labor Relations Act. DIRECTION OF ELECTION By virtue of and pursuant to the power vested in the National Labor Relations Board by Section 9 (c) of the National Labor Relations Act, and pursuant to Article III, Section 8, of National Labor Rela- tions Board Rules and Regulations-Series 1, as amended, it is hereby 462 -NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD DIRECTED that as part of the investigation authorized by the Board to ascertain representatives for the purposes of collective bargaining with Hamrick Mills , an election by secret ballot shall be conducted within fifteen ( 15) days from the date of this Direction of Election under the direction and supervision of the Regional Director for the Tenth Region, acting in this matter as agent for the National Labor Relations Board and subject to Article III, Section 9, of said Rules and Regulations-Series 1, as amended, among all the produc- tion and maintenance employees whose names appear on the Company's pay roll for the week ending March 5, 1938 , excluding clerical and supervisory employees and any, other employees- who have since quit or been discharged for cause , to determine whether or not they desire to be represented by Textile Workers Organizing Committee for the purposes of collective bargaining. [SAME TITLE] AMENDMENT TO DIRECTION OF ELECTION Jwne 8, 1938 On May 25, 1938, the National Labor Relations Board, herein called the Board, issued a Direction of Election in the above- entitled proceeding , the election to be held within fifteen ( 15) days from the date of Direction , under the direction and supervision of the Regional Director for the Tenth Region (Atlanta, Georgia). The Board , upon the recommendation of the Regional Director, for good cause shown, hereby amends its Direction of Election by strik- ing therefrom the words "within fifteen ( 15) days from the date, of this Direction of Election" and substituting therefor the words "at such time as the Board will in the future direct." MR. EDWIN S. SMITH took no part in the consideration of the above Amendment to Direction of Election.