General Motors Corp.Download PDFNational Labor Relations Board - Board DecisionsDec 30, 194028 N.L.R.B. 793 (N.L.R.B. 1940) Copy Citation In the Matter of GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION , CHEVROLET DIVISION and INTERNATIONAL UNION OF OPERATING ENGINEERS , LOCALS 30 & 30-A Case No. R-2184.-Decided December 30, ,1940 Jurisdiction : automobile assembling industry. Investigation and Certification of Representatives : existence of question : refusal to accord recognition to union; election necessary. Unit Appropriate for Collective Bargaining : operating engineers , including apprentice operating engineers but excluding chief engineers. Mr. John T. Smith, by Mr. Kevin McInerney and Mr. Gerard Smith, of New York City, for the Company. Goldstein d Goldstein, by Mr. Lawrence Kovalsky and Mr. Michael P. Connors, of New York City, for the Union. Mr. Louis Cokin, of counsel to the Board. DECISION AND DIRECTION OF ELECTION STATEMENT OF THE CASE On September 9,1940, International Union of Operating Engineers, Locals 30 & 30-A, herein called the Union, filed with the Regional Director for the Second Region (New York City) a petition alleging that a question affecting commerce had arisen concerning the repre- sentation of employees of General Motors Corporation, Chevrolet Tarrytown Division, North Tarrytown, New York, herein called the Company, and requesting an 'investigation and certification of representatives pursuant to Section 9 (c) of the National Labor Re- lations Act, 49 Stat. 449, herein called the Act. On November 14, 1940, the National Labor Relations Board, herein called the Board, acting pursuant to Section 9 (c) of the Act and Article III, Section 3, of National Labor Relations Board Rules and Regulations-Series 2, as amended, ordered an investigation and authorized' the Regional Director to conduct it and to provide for 'an appropriate hearing upon due notice. On November 14, 1940, the Regional Director issued a notice of hearing, copies of which were duly served upon the Company and 28 N. L. R. B., No. 122. 793 794 DECISIONS OF NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD the Union. Pursuant to notice, a hearing was held on December 2 -and 6, 1940, at New York City, before Shad Polier, the Trial Ex- aminer duly designated by the Board. The Company and the Union were represented by counsel and participated in the hearing. Full opportunity to,be heard, to examine and cross-examine witnesses, and to introduce evidence bearing on the issues was afforded all parties. During the course of the hearing counsel for the Union moved to amend the petition as to certain formal matters. The motion was granted. During the course of the hearing the Trial Examiner made several rulings on other motions and on objections to the admission of evidence. The Board has reviewed all the rulings of the Trial Examiner and finds that no prejudicial errors were committed. The rulings are hereby affirmed. Upon the entire record in the,case, the Board makes the following : FINDINGS OF FACT I. THE BUSINESS OF THE COMPANY The Company is a Delaware corporation with its principal offices located in New York City and with other offices in Detroit, Michigan. The Company has several unincorporated divisions. The division with which we are here concerned, Chevrolet Tarry- town Division, operates a plant at North Tarrytown, New York, where it is engaged in the assembling of complete automobiles from parts and accessories. All the parts and accessories used at the Tar- rytown plant are shipped to it from points outside of the State of New York and a substantial number of the completed automobiles are shipped by it to points outside the State of New York. The Company admits that the Tarrytown plant of Chevrolet Tarrytown Division is engaged in commerce within the meaning of Section 2 \ - .9 ^1.- A ... H. THE ORGANIZATION INVOLVED International Union -of Operating Engineers, Locals 30 & 30-A, are labor organizations affiliated with the American Federation of Labor. They admit to, membership all operating engineers and ap- prentice operating engineers in the Tarrytown plant of Chevrolet Tarrytown Division of the Company. III. THE QUESTION CONCERNING REPRESENTATION The Union, claiming to represent a majority of the employees in the powerhouse at the Tarrytown plant of Chevrolet, Tarrytown Division, has requested the Company to `bargain with it as exclusive GENERAL, MOTORS CORPORATION 795' representative of'those employees. These requests have been refused by the Company. The'Union and the Company agreed at the hear- ing that all of the ' employees involved herein are members of the Union. We find that a question has arisen concerning the representation of the employees of the Company. IV. THE EFFECT OF THE QUESTION CONCERNING REPRESENTATION UPON COMMERCE We find that the question concerning representation which has11 arisen , occurring in connection with the operations of the Company described in Section I above, has a close, intimate, and substantial relation to trade, traffic, and commerce among the several States and tends to lead to labor disputes burdening and obstructing commerce and the free flow of commerce. V. THE APPROPRIATE UNIT The Union urges that all operating engineers and apprentice op- erating engineers employed in the powerhouse at the Tarrytown plant of Chevrolet Tarrytown Division of the Company, including the chief engineer, constitute an appropriate unit. At the hearing, a controversy arose concerning the proposed inclusion of the two apprentice operating engineers, both of whom are paid on an hourly basis, and the chief engineer. The Company objected to the proposed inclusion of the apprentice operating engineers in the unit. It contends that the apprentice operating engineers should be excluded because they are covered by a contract executed between the Company and International Union, United Automobile Workers of America, affiliated with the Congress of Industrial Organizations, herein called the United. Pursuant to a Direction of Election of the Board,' an election was conducted among all hourly paid production and maintenance employees at the Chevrolet Tarrytown Division of the Company, excluding cer- tain classifications of employees, among them being the operating engineers. Subsequently, as a result of the election, the Board certi- fied the United as the exclusive representative of the employees at the Chevrolet Tarrytown Division of the Company in the unit set forth above.2 Thereafter the United and the Company entered 'into an exclusive bargaining contract covering the employees in the above unit. The Company maintains that, inasmuch as the apprentice ' Matter of General Motors Corporation and International Union, U. A. W : A, affiliated withtheA F.L,etal,20 N L R.B.950. 2 24 N. L. R B. 159. 796 DECISIONS " OF NATIONAL LABOR , RELATIONS BOARD operating engineers were not expressly, excluded from the unit of production and maintenance employees in the previous election and fall within the classification of hourly paid maintenance employees, they are covered by its existing contract with the United. The two apprentice operating engineers work 'in the powerhouse under the direct supervision of six operating engineers. Although one of the apprentice operating engineers voted in the election alluded to above, he testified in this proceeding 'that he did so under a misapprehen- sion.3 The two apprentice operating engineers are and have been members of the Union since 1938. The Trial Examiner stated in the record of this proceeding that the Regional ' Director had notified the United of this proceeding and that the United disclaimed any interest in this controversy. Under these circumstances, we find that the, apprentice operating engineers should be included in the unit. The* Company objected to the proposed inclusion of the chief engineer in the unit. The Company contends that he should be ex- cluded because he is a supervisory and confidential employee. The chief engineer recommends hiring and discharging of employees in the' powerhouse, receives a higher rate of pay than the ordinary engineers, and, except in emergencies, does not engage in any manual work. We find that the chief engineer should be excluded from the unit. We find that all, operating engineers at the Tarrytown plant of Chevrolet Tarrytown Division of the Company, including apprentice operating engineers, but excluding the chief engineer, constitute a unit appropriate for the purposes of collective bargaining, and that said unit will insure to employees, of the Company the full benefit{ of their right to self-organization and to collective bargaining and otherwise effectuate the policies of the Act. VI. THE DETERMINATION OF REPRESENTATIVES The Union seeks to be certified on the basis of the record. Although the Company and the Union agreed at the hearing that all the employees in the appropriate unit were members of the Union, the Company stated that it desired an election prior to a certification of the Union., Under these circumstances, we believe that the ques- tion concerning representation which has arisen can best be resolved by means of an election by secret ballot.4 8 No notices of that election were posted in the powerhouse and this employee was the only employee in the powerhouse that voted. See Matter of 4rmour & Company and-United Packinghouse Workers, Local Industrial Union, Local No 13 of Packinghouse Workers Organizing Committee, affiliated with CIO, 13 N.L . R. B. 567. GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION 797 ` We find that the employees of the Company eligible to vote in the election shall be those employees in the appropriate unit who were employed during the pay-roll period immediately preceding the date of the • Direction of Election herein, including employees who did not work during such pay-roll period because they were ill or on vacation and employees who were then or have since been tem- porarily laid off, but excluding employees who have since quit or been discharged for cause. Upon the basis of the. above findings of fact and upon the entire record in the case, the Board makes the following : CONCLUSIONS OF LAW 1. A question affecting commerce has arisen concerning the rep- resentation of employees at the Tarrytown plant of Chevrolet Tarry- town Division, General Motors Corporation, within the meaning of Section 9 (c) and Section 2 (6) and (7) of the National Labor Relations Act. 2. All operating engineers at the Tarrytown plant of Chevrolet Tarrytown Division of the Company, including apprentice operating engineers, but excluding the chief engineer, constitute a unit appro- priate for the purposes of collective bargaining, within the meaning of Section 9 (b) of the National Labor Relations Act. DIRECTION OF ELECTION By virtue of and pursuant to the power vested in the National Labor'Relations Board by Section 9 (c) of the National Labor Re- lations Act, and pursuant to Article III, Section 8, of National Labor Relations Board Rules and Regulations-Series 2, as amended, it is hereby DIRECTED that, as part of the investigation authorized by the Board to ascertain representatives for the purposes of collective bargaining with General Motors Corporation, Chevrolet Tarrytown Division, North Tarrytown, New York, an election by secret ballot shall be conducted as early as possible, but not later than thirty (30) days from the date of this Direction, under the direction and supervision of the Regional Director for the Second Region, acting in this matter as agent for the National Labor Relations Board, and subject to Article III, Section 9, of said Rules and Regulations, among all operating engineers at the Tarrytown plant of Chevrolet Tarrytown Division of the Company who were employed during the pay-roll period immediately preceding the date of this Direction, including' apprentice operating engineers, employees who did not work during 798 DECISIONS OF NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD such pay-roll period because they were ill or on vacation, and em- ployees who were then or have since been temporarily laid off, but excluding the chief engineer and employees who have since quit or been discharged for cause, to determine whether or not they desire to be represented by International Union of Operating Engineers, Locals 30 & 30-A, affiliated with the American Federation of Labor, for the purposes of collective bargaining. CHAIRMAN HARRY A. MIILrs took no part in the consideration of the above Decision and Direction of Election. Copy with citationCopy as parenthetical citation