California Wool Scouring Co.

National Labor Relations Board - Board Decisions

Mar 4, 1938

5 N.L.R.B. 782 (N.L.R.B. 1938)

In the Matter Of CALIFORNIA WOOL SCOURING COMPANY and TEXTILE
WORKERS ORGANIZING COMMITTEE
Case No. R-447.-Decided March 4, 1938
Wool Processing Industry-Investigation of Representatives : controversy con-
,cerning representation of employees : rival organizations ; substantial doubt as
to majority status ; successor corporation charged with notice of transactions of
its predecessor ; contract executed with knowledge of petition pending before
Board no bar to investigation-Unit Appropriate for Collective Bargaining:
production and maintenance employees ; no controversy as to-Election Ordered
Mr. Jonathan H. Rowell, for the Board.
Mr. Hiram W. Johnson, Jr., of San Francisco, Calif., for the Com-
pany.
Gladstein, Grossman & Margolis, by Mr. Richard J. Gladstein, of
San Francisco , Calif., for the T. W. O. C.
Wolff c Wolff, by Mr. Harry K. Wolff, of San Francisco , Calif.,
for the Amalgamated.
Mr. Richard A. Perkins, of counsel to the Board.
DECISION
AND
DIRECTION OF ELECTION
STATEMENT OF TIIE CASE
On June 9, 1937, United Textile Workers Union of America filed
with the Regional Director for the Twentieth Region (San Francisco,
California) a petition alleging that a question affecting commerce
had arisen concerning the representation of employees of California
Wool Scouring Company, herein called. the Company, and requesting
an investigation and certification of representatives pursuant to Sec-
tion 9 (c) of the National Labor Relations Act, herein called the
Act. On July 28, 1937, the National Labor Relations Board, herein
called the Board, acting pursuant to Section 9 (c) of the Act and
Article III, Section 3, of National Labor Relations Board Rules
and Regulations-Series, 1, as amended, ordered an investigation and
authorized the Regional Director to conduct it and to provide for
an appropriate hearing upon due notice.
On October 12, 1937, Textile Workers Organizing Committee, herein
called the T. W. O. C., filed with the Regional Director an amended
782
DECISIONS AND ORDERS 783
and supplemental petition. On October 18, 1937, the Regional Direc-
tor issued a notice of hearing, copies of which were duly served upon
the Company, -upon the T. W. O. C., and upon Amalgamated Meat
Cutters and Butcher Workmen, Local 508, herein called the Amalgam-
ated, a labor organization claiming to represent employees directly
affected by the investigation. On November 1, 1937, the Board issued
an amended order directing an investigation and a hearing. Pur-
suant to the notice and amended order, a hearing was held on Novem-
ber 4, 5, and 6, 1937, at San Francisco, California, before P. H.
McNally, the Trial Examiner duly designated by the Board. The
Board, the Company, the T. W. O. C., and the Amalgamated were
represented by counsel and participated in the hearing. Full oppor-
tunity to be heard, to examine and cross-examine witnesses, and to
introduce evidence bearing on the issues was afforded all parties.
During the course of the hearing the Trial Examiner made several
rulings on motions and on objections to the admission of evidence.
Briefs were submitted on behalf of the Company and the Amalgam-.
ated. The Board has reviewed the rulings of the Trial Examiner
and finds that no prejudicial errors were committed. The rulings
are hereby affirmed.
Upon the entire,,record in-the case, the Board makes the following :
FINDINGS OF FACT
I. THE BUSINESS OF THE COMPANY
California Wool Scouring Company, a California corporation,. is
engaged in the processing of raw wool at its plant in San Francisco,
California. About May 22,1937, the Company took over such opera-
tions from the Western Wool Scouring Company, its lessor. The
processing consists of cleaning, carbonizing, sorting, grading, blend-
ing, and packing in bales and bags. The Company processed over
a million pounds' of wool in the period from May 22 to September 30,
1937.
The Company does not at any time hold title to the wool which it
processes. California wool buyers and brokers purchase raw wool
produced in California and transport it at their expense to the Com-
pany's plant. The Company stores the wool until receipt of instruc-
tions to commence processing operations. At the conclusion of such
operations the Company stores the wool until instructed to make
delivery.
The principal wool market of the United States is Boston, Massa-
chusetts, and most of the wool handled by customers of the Company
is shipped by water to the East coast. The Company stipulated that
'15 per cent of the wool processed by the Company is eventually
shipped to Boston and there sold.
784 NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD
H. THE ORGANIZATIONS INVOLVED
Textile Workers Organizing Committee is a labor organization
affiliated with United Textile Workers Union of America and with
the Committee for Industrial Organization, admitting to its member-
ship all production employees of the Company, excluding executives
of the rank of foreman and above and clerical workers.
_ Amalgamated Meat Cutters and Butcher Workmen, Local No. 508,
is a labor organization affiliated with the American Federation of
Labor. It admits to its membership all employees of the Company
excepting the superintendent, executives, watchmen, and office em-
ployees.
III. THE QUESTION CONCERNING REPRESENTATION
In April 1937 both the Amalgamated and the T. W. O. C. attempted
to organize the employees of the Western Wool Scouring Company,
the Company's predecessor. A witness for the T. W. O. C. testified
that at a meeting on April 27 a majority of the employees voted to
.affiliate with the T. W. O. C., and that on May 4 most of them signed
.applications for membership in that organization. Some of the
'employees paid initial membership fees to the T. W. O. C.
At the meeting on May 4 Sonia Baltrun, a T. W. O. C. organizer,
presented a suggested form of agreement with the Western Wool
-Scouring Company, and those present authorized her to present it to
that corporation. Mrs. Baltrun mailed the proposed agreement to
the Western Wool Scouring Company about May 15. On May 19 the
plant shut down and the management informed the employees the
plant was changing hands. The employees thought the shut-down
was a lock-out, because wool was left in process and the plant was
not cleaned up. The employees thought the management preferrec .
to deal with the Amalgamated.
On the day the plant closed and again on May 23 Mrs. Baltrun
advised groups of employees to join the Amalgamated, and told them
the T. W. O. C. would petition the Board for an investigation. The
employees accordingly on May 19 and during the next few days
joined the Amalgamated. On May 20 the Western-Wool Scouring
'Company replied to the letter addressed to it by Mrs. Baltrun, stating
that it had discontinued business. On May 22 the plant reopened
under the management of the Company with substantially the same
group of employees formerly employed by its predecessor and the
same supervisory personnel.
On May 25 Mrs. Baltrun wrote the Company, submitting a form
of agreement similar to that sent the Western Wool Scouring Com-
pany and requesting that negotiations be opened. The Company
replied June 1, stating that having ,been informed that the Amalga-
DECISIONS AND ORDERS 785
mated represented the employees, it was negotiating with that organ-
ization. On June 9 the original petition was filed herein. Meanwhile,
the employees, acting as members of the Amalgamated, proceeded to
consider the Amalgamated's proposed agreement with the Company
and finally ratified it on. June 22. The agreement, executed on June
30, provided for a closed shop and was to run a year from May 24,
1937, being made retroactive to that date.
Counsel for the Company, the Amalgamated, the T. W. O. C., and'
the Board stipulated. that the Regional Director for the Twentieth
Region by letter dated June 10, 1937, advised the Company that a peti-
tion had on June 9 been filed by the United Textile Workers Union
,of America; that by a telephone communication on June 14 from the
secretary of the Company to a field examiner for the Twentieth Re-
gion, the Company acknowledged receipt of the letter of June 10;
that by a letter dated June 14, the'Company confirmed the telephone
conversation had that day; and that on June 26, representatives of
the Amalgamated met the Regional Director and discussed the possi-
bility of a consent election in lieu of a formal investigation and hear-
ing. It is therefore clear that at the time the Company and the
Amalgamated signed the closed-shop agreement they had knowledge
that this proceeding was pending before the Board. Under the cir-
cumstances we conclude that the closed-shop agreement does not affect
the determination of the issues herein.
We find that a question has arisen concerning representation of
.employees of the Company.
IV. THE EFFECT OF THE QUESTION CONCERNING REPRESENTATION UPON
COMMERCE
We find that the question concerning representation which has
arisen, occurring in connection with the operations of the Company
described in Section I above, has a close, intimate, and substantial
relation to trade, traffic, and commerce among the several States, and
tends to lead to labor disputes burdening and obstructing commerce
and the free flow of commerce.
V. THE APPROPRIATE UNIT
The T. W. O. C. in its petition alleges that all production workers of
the Company, excluding executives of the rank of foreman and above
and clerical workers, constitute a unit appropriate for collective
bargaining . Neither the Company nor the Amalgamated raised
any objection to such a bargaining unit.
We find that all production employees of the Company, exclud-
ing executives of the rank of foreman and above and clerical work-
,ers, constitute a unit appropriate for the purpose of collective bar-
786 NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD
gaining and that said unit will insure to employees of the Company
the full benefit of their right to self-organization and to collective-
bargaining and otherwise effectuate the policies of the Act.
VI. THE DETERMINATION OF REPRESENTATIVES
A representative of the T. W., O. C. testified that 30 of the ap-
proximately 41 production employees of the Company signed.
T. W. O. C. membership application cards early in May 1937. The
evidence indicates that about May 19 a majority of such employees
joined the Amalgamated under the circumstances above described.
Since a majority of the production employees at about the same
period signed applications for membership in both the T. W. O. C.
and the Amalgamated, and in view of all the other circumstances
present in this case, we feel that Sufficient evidence does not exist
to permit a certification of either union. We find, therefore, that
the question which has arisen concerning representation of employ-
ees of the Company can best be resolved by holding an election by
secret ballot.
The pay roll of the Company for September 30, 1937, was sub-
mitted in evidence. The evidence indicates that the plant was in full
operation at the time of the hearing, and that there had been no,
substantial change in personnel since September 30. We shall there-
fore direct the election to be held among those employees in the
appropriate unit who were on the pay roll of the Company on
September 30, 1937, excluding those who have since quit or been
discharged for cause.
Upon the basis of the above findings of fact and upon the entire.
record in the case, the Board makes the following :
CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
1. A question affecting commerce has arisen concerning the rep-
resentation of employees of California Wool Scouring Company,,
San Francisco, California, within the meaning of Section 9 (c) and
Section 2 (6) and (7) of the National Labor Relations Act.
2. All employees of the Company, excluding executives of the
rank of foreman and above and clerical workers, constitute a unit
appropriate for the purposes of collective bargaining, within, the'
meaning of Section 9 (b) of the National Labor Relations Act.
DIRECTION OF ELECTION
By virtue of and pursuant to the power vested in the National
Labor Relations Board by Section 9 (c) of the National Labor Re-
lations Act, 49 Stat. 449, and pursuant to Article III, Section 8, of
National Labor Relations Board Rules and Regulations-Series 1, as
amended, it is hereby
DECISIONS AND ORDERS 787
DIRECTED that, as part of the investigation authorized by the Board
to ascertain representatives for collective bargaining with California
Wool Scouring Company, San Francisco, California, an election by
secret ballot shall be conducted within twenty (20) days from the date
of this Direction, under the direction and supervision of the Regional
Director for the Twentieth Region, acting in this matter as agent for
the National Labor Relations Board, and subject to Article III, Sec-
tion' 9, of said Rules and Regulations-Series 1, as amended, among
all employees of California Wool Scouring Company who were on
the pay roll of the Company on September 30, 1937, excluding execu-
tives of the rank of foreman and above and clerical workers, and those
who have since quit or have been discharged for cause, to determine
whether they desire to be represented by Textile Workers Organ-
izing Committee or Amalgamated Meat Cutters and Butcher Work-
men, Local 508, for the purposes of collective bargaining, or by
neither.