Cal-Sample Printers, Inc.

National Labor Relations Board - Board Decisions

Dec 30, 1965

156 N.L.R.B. 543 (N.L.R.B. 1965)

CAL-SAMPLE PRINTERS, INC. 543
NOTE.-We will notify any of the above-named employees presently serving in the
Armed Forces of the United States of their right to full reinstatement upon applica-
tion in accordance with the Selective Service and the Universal Military Training
and Service Act, as amended, after discharge from the Armed Forces.
This notice must remain posted for 60 consecutive days from the date of posting,
and must not be altered, defaced, or coveted by any other material.
If employees have any question concerning this notice or compliance with its
provisions, they may communicate directly with the Board's Regional Office, 746
Federal Office Building, 167 North Main Street, Memphis, Tennessee, Telephone
No. 534-3161.
Cal-Sample Printers, Inc. and Offset Workers, Printing Pressmen
& Assistants Union #78 of Los Angeles & Vicinity, affiliated
with The International Printing Pressmen & Assistants Union
of North America, AFL-CIO; Bookbinders ' & Bindery Wom-
,en's Union Local #63, affiliated with The International Broth-
erhood of Bookbinders , AFL-CIO; Los Angeles Typographical
Union #174, affiliated with The International Typographical
Union , AFL-CIO, Joint Petitioners . Case No. 31-RC-17 (for-
merly 21-RC-9600) . December 30,1965
DECISION AND DIRECTION OF ELECTION
Upon a petition duly filed under Section 9 (c) of the National Labor
Relations Act, as amended, a hearing was held before Hearing Officer
Barton W. Robertson. The Hearing Officer's rulings made at the
hearing are free from prejudicial error and are hereby affirmed.
Briefs have been filed by the Employer and by the Joint Petitioners.
Pursuant to Section 3(b) of the National Labor Relations Act, as
amended, the National Labor Relations Board has delegated its powers
in connection with this case to a three-member panel [Chairman
McCulloch and Members Fanning and Jenkins].
Upon the entire record in this case, the'Board finds:
1. The Employer is engaged in commerce within the meaning of
the Act and it will effectuate the purposes of the Act to assert juris-
diction herein.
2. The labor organizations involved claim to represent certain
employees of the Employer.
3. A question affecting commerce exists concerning the representa-
tion of certain employees of the Employer within the meaning of
Section 9(c) (1) and Section 2(6) and (7) of the Act.
4. The Employer takes the position that the only appropriate unit
is a production and maintenance unit of both Cal-Sample Printers,
Inc., and Cal-Sample Service, Inc. The Joint Petitioners, however,
contend that a departmental unit of all pressmen, compositors, and
cutters in the printshop is also an appropriate one.
156 NLRB No. 48.
544 DECISIONS OF NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD
There is no previous history of collective bargaining within the
plant, and no union seeks to represent the printshop employees in a
broader unit.
Cal-Sample Service is in the business of manufacturing sample
swatch cards for the upholstery and drapery trade. Cal-Sample
Printers, a subsidiary corporation of Sample Service, does the print-
ing work for Sample Service and performs no work for outside
customers.
All of the stock of Sample Printers is owned by Sample Service and
the top level management of both corporations is the same. Both cor-
porations are located in the same U-shaped, one-story building with
the printshop located at the back end of the building. Employees of
both companies punch the'same time clocks, share the same lunchroom
facilities, work the same hours, and receive the same general benefits.
Sample Service employees receive payroll checks in the name of Cal-
Sample Service, whereas the printshop employees are on the payroll
of Cal-Sample Printers. Cal-Sample Printers is, in effect, the print-
ing department of Cal-Sample Service, and for the purposes of this
proceeding the two corporations constitute a single employer.
The printing department consists of seven pressmen, four com-
positors, two papercutters, and a proofreader. The pressmen and
compositors perform all the printing work that is done by the Em-
ployer. The cutters cut paper and fabric, some of which is used in
the printing operations and some not. The proofreader spends 50
percent of his time proofreading and the remainder on the heat
stamper, the printshop scorer, or the cutting room scorer.
The printshop employees spend all their time, with few exceptions,
working in the printshop. Employees in other departments, how-
ever, do interchange with one another. With the exception of the use
of the scorer, the papercutter, and the heat stamper, employees of
other departments do not use equipment in the printshop. The Em-
ployer hires printshop employees for a 2-week probationary period
and conducts no training or apprenticeship program for them. How-
ever, the Employer does request the employment agency or school to
find applicants with some knowledge of or experience with printing.
Virtually all the printshop employees when hired had either experi-
ence or school training in printshop work. Although both sets of
employees are paid on an hourly basis, Sample Printer's employees
are significantly higher paid. The record clearly discloses that the
vast majority of nonsupervisory employees, excluding those in the
printshop, receive a wage rate which varies between $1.25 and $2
LOCAL 98D, INT'L UNION OF OPERATING ENGINEERS 545
per hour.' However, the printshop employees, with two exceptions,
receive from $2.50 to $3.50 per hour. They are not only higher paid
than virtually all other nonsupervisory employees, but in addition
many of the printshop employees receive higher wage rates than super-
visors in other departments.
In these circumstances, we are satisfied that the printshop employ-
ees are a functionally distinct departmental group constituting an
appropriate bargaining unit .2
Accordingly, we find that the following employees of the Employer
constitute a unit appropriate for the purposes of collective bargaining
within the meaning of Section 9 (b) of the Act :
All printshop employees engaged in letterpress presswork on verti-
cals, Kluges, Heidelbergs, horizontals, and platen presses; engaged in
typesetting operations, including hand composition, operating Lud-
lows, and Linotype machines; operating papercutters; and engaged in
proofreading; 3 but excluding all other employees.
[Text of Direction of Election omitted from publication.]
I The only exceptions are the cutting department where the wage rate ranges from
$2 to $2.60 per hour, and the assembly department where the range is $1.30 to $2.35
per hour. Four of the five nonsupervisory employees in the cutting department, how-
ever , receive $2.40 per hour or less.
z J. L. Hudson Company, 103 NLRB 1378.
3 The Joint Petitioners took no position on the unit placement of the proofreader.
Since he does most of his work in the printshop and since he is on the payroll of Cal-
Sample Printers , Inc., we shall also include him in the unit.
Local 98D, International Union of Operating Engineers, AFL-
CIO (Construction Field Surveys, Inc.) and Marcus B. Dunn.
Case No. 1-CB-956. January 3,1966
DECISION AND ORDER
On August 17, 1965, Trial Examiner Horace A. Ruckel issued his
Decision in the above-entitled proceeding, finding that the Respond-
ent had not engaged in the unfair labor practices alleged in the com-
plaint and recommending that the complaint be dismissed in its
entirety, as set forth in the attached Trial Examiner's Decision.
.Thereafter, the General Counsel filed exceptions to the Trial Exam-
iner 's Decision and a brief in support thereof.
Pursuant to the provisions of Section 3(b) of the National Labor
Relations Act, as amended, the National Labor Relations Board has
delegated its powers in connection with this case to a three-member
panel [Chairman McCulloch and Members Brown and Zagoria].
156 NLRB No. 57.