Atlantic Footwear Co., Inc.

National Labor Relations Board - Board Decisions

Feb 12, 1938

5 N.L.R.B. 252 (N.L.R.B. 1938)

In the Matter of ATLANTIC FOOTWEAR COMPANY, INC., and UNITED
SHOE WORKERS OF AMERICA OF THE C. I. O.
Case No. R-5&0.Decided February 12, 1938
Shoe Manufacturing Industry-Investigation of Representatives : controversy
concerning representation of employees : rival organizations ; refusal of em-
ployer to bargain with petitioning union because of prior closed-shop agreement
with rival organization ; strike ; agreement not renewed prior to expiration and
no bar to determination of question concerning representation-Strike-Unit
Appropriate for Collective Bargaining: production employees ; history of collec-
tive bargaining relations with employer ; no controversy as to-Election Or-
dered: names of both unions to appear on ballot.
Mr. Christopher Hoey, for the Board.
Mr. Samuel B. Feld, of Passaic, N. J., for the Company.
Mr. Ben Goodkin, of Passaic, N. J., for the United.
Miss Loretta Gordon, of Brooklyn, N. Y., for the A. F. of L.
Mr. A. J. Toth, of counsel to the Board.
DECISION
AND
DIRECTION OF ELECTION
STATEMENT OF THE CASE
On November 16, 1937, United Shoe Workers of America, affiliated
with the Committee for Industrial Organization, herein called the
United, filed with the Regional Director for the Second Region (New
York City) a petition alleging that a question affecting commerce
had arisen concerning the representation of employees of Atlantic
Footwear Company, Inc., Passaic, New Jersey, herein called the Com-
pany, and requesting an investigation and certification of representa-
tives pursuant to Section 9 (c) of the National Labor Relations Act,
49 Stat. 449, herein called the Act. On December 16, 1937, the
National Labor Relations Board, herein called the Board, acting
pursuant to Section 9 (c) of the Act and Article III, Section 3, of
National Labor Relations Board Rules and Regulations-Series 1, as
amended, ordered an investigation and authorized the Regional Di-
rector to conduct it and to provide for an appropriate hearing upon
due notice.
On December 3, 1937, the Regional Director issued a notice of
hearing, copies of which were duly served upon the Company, upon
the United, and upon the Boot and Shoe Workers Union Local No.
674, affiliated with the American Federation of Labor, herein called
the Boot and Shoe Workers Union, a labor organization claiming
to represent employees directly affected by the investigation. Pur-
suant to the notice, a hearing was held on December 10, 1937, at
252
DECISIONS AND ORDERS 253
New York City, before H. R. Korey, the Trial Examiner duly
designated by the Board. The Board , the United , and the Boot and
Shoe Workers Union were represented by counsel . Upon the failure
of the Company to appear , the hearing was adjourned and resumed
on December 16, 21 , and 23, 1937 .1 Full opportunity to be heard, to
examine and cross-examine witnesses , and to introduce evidence
bearing upon the issues was afforded all parties . During the course
of the hearing the Trial Examiner made several rulings on motions
and on objections to the admission of evidence . The Board has re-
viewed the rulings of the Trial Examiner and finds that no preju-
dicial errors were committed. The rulings are hereby affirmed.
Upon the entire record in the case, the Board makes the following :
FINDINGS OF FACT
I. THE BUSINESS OF THE COMPANY
The Atlantic Footwear Company, Inc., a New Jersery corporation,
with its only factory located at Passaic, New Jersey, is engaged in
the manufacture of leather, satin, and felt slippers for ladies', men's
and children's wear. The Company's volume of business for the
year 1936 totaled approximately $75,000.2 During this same year
approximately $45,000 worth of raw materials were purchased, con-
sisting mainly of imitation leather, felt material, binding, cotton
padding, and footwear ornaments. Eighty to eighty-five per cent of
the raw material is purchased from sources outside the State of New
Jersey and approximately ninety per cent of the finished product is
shipped to buyers outside the State.
H. THE ORGANIZATIONS INVOLVED
The United Shoe Workers of America is a labor organization affili-
ated with the Committee for Industrial Organization, admitting to
its membership all production employees of the Company, excluding
foremen, foreladies, and office help.
Boot and Shoe Workers Union, Local No. 674, is a labor organiza-
tion affiliated with the American Federation of Labor. It admits to
its membership all employees of the Company, except supervisory
and clerical help.
III. THE QUESTION CONCERNING REPRESENTATION
On May 12, 1937, the Company entered into a written contract
with Boot and Shoe Workers Union. The agreement is effective
1 The Boot and Shoe Workers Union failed to appear on December 16, 1937, and was
not represented during the remainder of the bearing The president of the Company
appeared at the hearing on December 16, 1937, but refused to proceed without first
obtaining counsel. On December 21 and 23, 7937, the Company was represented by
counsel.
2 Stipulation entered into on facts and figures relating to interstate commerce.
254 NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD
until I'ebruary 15 , 1938, with a proviso for renewal upon written
application of either party by December 15, 1937, stating proposed
changes and alterations in the contract for the ensuing year. Neither
party has given notice of a desire to renew as provided and the
agreement will terminate February 15, 1938. - For this reason, the
contract presents no problem in our consideration of the issues in this
case.
During June and July, 1937, the employees of the Company voted
to change their affiliation to the United and to have the United ad-
minister the contract of Boot and Shoe Workers Union. Following
this change in affiliation, Boot and Shoe Workers Union took no
further interest in the plant and the business agent of Boot and Shoe
Workers became the business agent of the United.
During September and October, 1937, the United attempted to
bargain with the Company as representative of the employees but
the Company refused recognition , contending that the contract with
Boot and Shoe Workers Union was in existence . On November 1,
1937, the United renewed its efforts to bargain collectively on the
piece price of a new pattern slipper which was introduced during
the latter part of October . The Company flatly refused to recognize
the United and the employees walked out , causing a partial stoppage
of production . This strike is still in progress.
The Company states that it is willing to bargain with the labor
organization representing a majority of its employees.
We find that a question has arisen concerning representation of
employees of the Company.
IV. THE EFFECT OF THE QUESTION CONCERNING REPRESENTATION
UPON COMMERCE
We find that the question concerning representation which has
arisen, occurring in connection with the operations of the Company
described in Section I above, has a close, intimate , and substantial
relation to trade, traffic , and commerce among the several States, and
has led to and tends to lead to labor disputes burdening and obstruct-
ing commerce and the free flow of commerce.
V. THE APPROPRIATE UNIT
The United claims that the production employees of the Company,
excluding clerical and supervisory employees , constitute a unit ap-
propriate for collective bargaining . Boot and Shoe Workers Union,
not participating in the hearing, makes no claim as to the appropri-
ate unit, but had bargained with the Company on that basis in its
contract of May 12, 1937 . The Company raised no objection to the
claimed appropriate unit. Under these circumstances , we shall adopt
DECISIONS AND ORDERS 255
the unit which has,been recognized and utilized by"the parties as a
basis for bargaining. -
We find that the production employees of the Company, excluding
clerical and supervisory help, constitute a unit appropriate for the
purposes of collective bargaining and that said unit will insure to
employees of the Company the full benefit of their right to self-
organization and to collective bargaining and to otherwise effectuate
the policies of the Act.
VI. THE DETERMINATION OF REPRESENTATIVES
The United introduced into evidence 48 application cards signed
by employees of the Company during the latter part of August
1937, authorizing the United to represent them. The pay roll of
the Company varies, with 50 to 60 employed during the peak of pro-
duction and 40 to 45 during normal production. The Company failed
to produce records or other evidence affording an adequate basis for
accurately determining the number of employees between October 1,
and November 1, 1937. It offered in evidence a handwritten list of
names which, according to the secretary of the Company, was copied
from the pay-roll sheet of November 1, 1937. This list was objected
to by the United as inadequate and incomplete because it did not
include employees, members of the United, who worked prior to
November 1, 1937, the date of the strike. No other pay-roll list was
introduced. Joseph Cammerano, the shop chairman for United and
an employee of the Company for two years, testified that 36 out of
the 39 employees on the pay-roll list of November 1, 1937, were United
members. A check of the membership cards against this list shows
a total of only 18 out of the 39 employees on the list to be members
of the United. As the pay-roll list of November 1, 1937, furnishes
no satisfactory indication of the number of United members em-
ployed by the Company prior to the period of strike, and in view of
the disparity between the testimony of Cammerano and the docu-
mentary evidence in the form of the Company's pay-roll list, we find
that an election by secret ballot is necessary to determine the proper
representatives for collective bargaining and to resolve the question
of representation. Those eligible to vote shall be the production
employees, excluding clerical and supervisory help, who were em-
ployed during the pay-roll period immediate]y preceding October
25, 1937, the week prior to the strike.
Upon the basis of the above findings of fact and upon the record
in the case, the Board makes the following :
CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
1. A question affecting commerce has arisen concerning the repre-
sentation of employees of Atlantic Footwear Company, Inc., Passaic,
256 NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD
New Jersey, within the meaning of Section 9 (c) and Section 2 (6)
and (7) of the National Labor-Relations Act.
2. The production employees of the Company excluding clerical
and supervisory employees, constitute a unit appropriate for the pur-
poses of collective bargaining, within the meaning of Section 9 (b)
of the National Labor Relations Act.
DIRECTION OF ELECTION
By virtue of and pursuant to the power vested in the National La-
bor Relations Board by Section 9 (c) of the National Labor Relations
Act, 49 Stat. 449, and pursuant to Article III, Section 8, of Na-
tional Labor Relations Board Rules and Regulations-Series 1, as
amended, it is hereby
DIRECTED that, as part of the investigation authorized by the Board
to ascertain representatives for collective bargaining with the At-
lantic Footwear Company, Inc., Passaic, New Jersey, an election by
secret ballot shall be conducted within fifteen (15) days from the
date of this Direction, under the direction and supervision of the
Regional Director for the Second Region, acting in this matter as
agent for the National Labor Relations Board, and subject to Article
III, Section 9, of said Rules and Regulations-Series 1, as amended,
among the production employees of the Atlantic Footwear Company,
Inc., who were employed by the Company during the pay-roll period
immediately preceding October 25, 1937, excluding supervisory and
clerical help, to determine whether they desire to be represented by
the United Shoe Workers of America, affiliated with the C. I. 0., or
by Boot and Shoe Workers Union, affiliated with the American Feder-
ation of Labor, for the purposes of collective bargaining, or by
neither.
[SAME TITLE]
AMENDED DIRECTION OF ELECTION
February 04, 1938
On February 12, 1938, the National Labor Relations Board, herein
called the Board, issued its Decision and Direction of Election in
the above-entitled proceedings. The Direction of Election provided
that "an election by secret ballot shall be conducted within fifteen
(15) days from the date of this Direction, under the direction and
supervision of the Regional Director for the Second Region."
The Board, having been informed by the Regional Director for
the Second Region that additional time will be required for the
holding of the said election, hereby directs that the time for the
holding of the election provided for in its said Direction of Election
be, and it hereby is, extended indefinitely.