Ascenda USA, Inc., d/b/a 24-7 InTouch

National Labor Relations Board - Board Decisions

May 19, 2016

12-CA-164968 (N.L.R.B. May. 19, 2016)

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
BEFORE THE NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD
ASCENDA USA INC. D/B/A
24-7 INTOUCH
and Case 12-CA-164968
STEPHANIE RENEE YOUNG
ORDER1
The Employer’s Petition to Revoke Subpoena Duces Tecum No. B-1-QIB29Z is
denied. The subpoena seeks information relevant to the matter under investigation and
describes with sufficient particularity the evidence sought, as required by Section 11(1)
of the Act and Section 102.31(b) of the Board’s Rules and Regulations.2 Further, the
Employer has failed to establish any other legal basis for revoking the subpoena. See
generally, NLRB v. North Bay Plumbing, Inc., 102 F.3d 1005 (9th Cir. 1996); NLRB v.
Carolina Food Processors, Inc., 81 F.3d 507 (4th Cir. 1996).3
Dated, Washington, D.C., May 19, 2016
MARK GASTON PEARCE, CHAIRMAN
PHILIP A. MISCIMARRA, MEMBER
KENT Y. HIROZAWA, MEMBER

1 The National Labor Relations Board has delegated its authority in this proceeding to a three-
member panel.
2 To the extent that the subpoena encompasses some documents that the Employer believes in
good faith to be subject to the attorney-client privilege or the attorney work product doctrine, this
Order is without prejudice to the Employer’s prompt submission of a privilege log to the Region
identifying and describing each such document, and providing sufficient detail to permit an
assessment of the Employer’s claim of privilege or protection. The Employer is directed to
produce all responsive documents in its possession not subject to any good-faith claim of
privilege or protection.
3 In addition, the General Counsel has indicated in his opposition brief that he is willing to
modify the subpoena by limiting the information requested in paragraphs 3, 4, and 5 in certain
respects, and accepting the information from paragraph 2 in an alternate format. In considering
the petition to revoke and additional arguments raised in the petition, we have evaluated the
subpoena as modified in this manner.